Bookmark and Share

Who is Robert Cooksey?

Father-in-law of now-infamous extensively drug-resistant TB patient studies tuberculosis at the CDC, and is now under review by the agency


[Published 21st June 2007 04:43 PM GMT]


Robert Cooksey, the father-in-law of the lawyer who exposed people in several countries to a drug-resistant form of tuberculosis, has spent 32 years characterizing the bacteria that cause TB and other illnesses in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Division of Tuberculosis Elimination.

Pablo Bifani, a researcher at the Pasteur Institute in Brussels who coauthored two papers with Cooksey, said Cooksey has contributed important work to his field, but has not built up the same prestige as others in the field. "I think he does good work, but he's not one of those who is in the forefront of TB research. But that's because he's at the CDC, and they have other responsibilities."

Cooksey led a group of researchers who identified two strains of a novel species of Mycobacterium, which they dubbed Mycobacteria cosmeticum. The new strains, found in both an Atlanta nail salon and a Venezuelan female undergoing a cosmetic procedure, were genetically different from known species.

Cooksey has access to a large pool of isolates of clinical TB, and identifies specific genes that are associated with drug resistance.

Bifani, a researcher at the Pasteur Institute in Brussels, said he does not know Cooksey personally, but the two have coauthored two studies that characterized genetic diversity and distribution of global strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The studies were coauthored by more than 40 additional researchers and are among Cooksey's most highly cited work. One study, published in Emerging Infectious Disease, has been cited 54 times since 2002, and the other, published in the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, has been cited 55 times since 2003.

In the two papers, researchers identified strains from more than 90 countries using spacer oligonucleotide typing, a new and faster method that uses PCR amplification to detect M. tuberculosis isolates and identify related strains in a much shorter time period than previous techniques. The two studies built on each other to describe TB genotype diversity.

"Those studies are quite unique because there are not so many bacteria in which this has been done, that have been typed in a worldwide scale with such a method," Kristin Kremer, another coauthor on the studies from the Diagnosis Laboratory for Infectious Diseases and Perinatal Screening in Bilthoven, Netherlands, who was not familiar with Cooksey's role in the study, told The Scientist.

According to a CDC statement, the agency "will be looking at how [Cooksey] was involved" in the case. His son-in-law, Andrew Speaker made headlines last month when the CDC placed him in federal quarantine (the first in nearly 45 years) after he traveled with extensively drug resistant TB (XDR-TB) by taking two international flights and traveling around Europe.

Given the unique circumstances, "we've asked the Department of Health and Human Services Inspector General to come down and evaluate Dr. Cooksey's involvement as well," Tom Skinner, CDC spokesperson, told The Scientist.

Skinner said the CDC wants a full understanding of all aspects of the case. "We're not approaching this from the standpoint that any criminal activity happened," he said.

Cooksey issued a statement last month, denying having any involvement with Speaker's decision to travel. Cooksey did not respond to Email requests for comment. The CDC declined to connect The Scientist with Cooksey or his colleagues at the agency.

Steven Hinrichs, from the University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha, who coauthored a 2004 study with Cooksey, told The Scientist the case is "unusual and remarkable." "That doesn't mean it's not worth investigating and following up on," he added.

In the study, cited nine times since publication in the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Hinrichs and Cooksey used a new assay Hinrichs' group had developed to detect genes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (the agent that causes TB) and its close relative Mycobacterium bovis that confer resistance to pyrazinamide (PZA), a first-line treatment. Hinrichs said Cooksey helped interpret the results and their relevance to other organisms within the Mycobacterium genus.

Many of the studies Cooksey has coauthored in the past 10 years have been cited about two to three times a year. Of these, several have been conducted in collaboration with state or local health departments in identifying strains of Mycobacterium involved in infection outbreaks in hospitals.

"Dr. Cooksey is an outstanding microbiologist and scientist, and he's contributed significantly to the field of microbiology and Mycobacterium characterization," Hinrichs said.

Kelly Rae Chi
mail@the-scientist.com

Links within this article:

K. Eban, "Biosense or biononsense," The Scientist, April 2007.
http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/52963/

Pablo Bifani
http://www.pasteur.be/pasteur_fr/index0855.html?page=molecular_pathology

R. Cooksey, et al., "Mycobacterium cosmeticum sp. nov., a novel rapidly growing species isolated from a cosmetic infection and from a nail salon," Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, Nov. 2004.
http://www.the-scientist.com/pubmed/15545488

Mycobacterium cosmeticum
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycobacterium_cosmeticum

I. Filliol, et al., "Global distribution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis spoligotypes," Emerg Infect Dis, Nov. 2002.
http://www.the-scientist.com/pubmed/12453368

I. Filliol, et al., "Snapshot of moving and expanding clones of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and their global distribution assessed by spoligotyping in an international study," J Clin Microbiol, May 2003.
http://www.the-scientist.com/pubmed/12734235

M. Borgdorff, "Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing Genotype, the Netherlands," Emerg Infect Dis, Oct. 2003.
http://www.the-scientist.com/pubmed/14609469

CDC Media Update: XDR TB Public Health Investigation, June 2, 2007.
http://www.cdc.gov/od/oc/media/pressrel/2007/r070608.htm

"TB patient asks forgiveness but defends travel," ABC News, June 1, 2007.
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/OnCall/story?id=3231184&page=1

"Statement by Robert C. Cooksey," Webwire, May 31, 2007.
http://www.webwire.com/ViewPressRel.asp?aId=37867

Steven Hinrichs
http://www.unmc.edu/Pathology/facultypages/hinrichsbio.htm

A. Mohamed, et al., "Temperature-mediated heteroduplex analysis for detection of pncA mutations associated with pyrazinamide resistance and differentiation between Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis by denaturing high- performance liquid chromatography," J Clin Microbiol, March 2004.
http://www.the-scientist.com/pubmed/15004047


Advertisement

 

Rate this article

Rating: 1.86/5 (7 votes )





Does Michael have a point?
by anonymous poster

[Comment posted 2010-07-27 04:22:05]
Michael commented on my post long ago, and I read his comment w/ some interest. I'm interested to know if he as a point to make about either the original article (which I contended was lame), or my comment on it.

Yes, Michael, I have published papers. Others have cited my work which is synonymous with referencing it. Yes, I have been awarded grants by NIH study sections. In this case, my publication record was relevant. But it would not be relevant to an investigation of whether I was involved in urinating on your doorstep. Likewise, I contend that Dr. Cooksey's publication record is irrelevant to his involvement with his son-in-law. No one is questioning Dr. Cooksey's scientific abilities.

I still contend that this article doesn't say much, and you didn't point out anything significant that it teaches us.

As for the rest, Michael does not appreciate my sense of humor, or the points I made because he is so caught up in being prudish and politically correct that he didn't take the time to ponder my few words. I most certainly did not make a racist comment; in fact my comment was anti-racist, pointing out that it is not appropriate for a scientist to escape a bit of scrutiny because his papers have been cited, whereas similar circumstances would have produced a major investigation based on race. My point is that people should be treated equally.

Baxter Zappa



A Missed Opportunity!!
by Pablo Bifani

[Comment posted 2007-06-24 10:11:54]
I found the report by Ms Rae Chi in The Scientist regarding Dr Cooksey, a tuberculosis researcher, extremely disappointing. During a phone conversation with Ms Rae Chi, I answered a series of questions which, in the article, have been dis-contextualized, mis-represented and therefore are misleading. Associating my name to negative comments in regards to Dr Cooksey is grossly inaccurate, inappropriate and in contradiction with our discussion. This story is also disappointing in light of the time spent explaining how biosafety level 3 laboratories work, TB-transmission and drug resistance. I find it unfortunate that a magazine such as The Scientist has interest in this type of gossip rather than focusing on more important aspects about TB and public health. Rather than spending time on tangential issues (inappropriately no less), it would be more appropriate to have The Scientist focusing on educating the public about TB, a disease which affects millions of people yearly and kills over 2 millions, all people that have not met Dr Cooksey. This XDR-TB case would have been a wonderful opportunity to generate public awareness about TB in general and challenges involved in TB control in particular. In regard to this coincidence, the true source of transmission (or absence off), will most likely be demonstrated by molecular genotyping techniques. In the meantime, I would like to express my outmost respect to Dr Cooksey for his work and support in confronting this type of persecution.



Thanks for this story
by JC Jones

[Comment posted 2007-06-24 09:48:12]
What makes this story worth investigating is that Dr. Cooksey, according to the Atlanta Journal Constitution, "prepared his son-in-law's specimen for testing as part of his regular duties". Most likely he was involved in the HPLC genotyping & drug susceptibility testing. Why did it take CDC so long to get the results? What is the truth? See my post: LINK



Re: Baxter Zappa's comments
by Michael

[Comment posted 2007-06-23 12:10:28]
Actually, yes - the number of citations is very informative and added to the article. The impact-factor of journals (I'll assume Baxter knows what this is as he/she tries to sound knowledgeable about this) is based largely on the number of times an article has been cited (not "referenced" as Baxter stated), signifying that other scientists found it important enough to include in their own studies as well as lending credibility to the contribution that the scientist has made to their field. In addition, when study sections (I'll again assume Baxter knows what these are) determine who gets funded, one of the criteria considered is the number of publications and (again) the number of citations.

When Robert Cooksey first made the news as an "expert" in his field, one of the first things I (and many others) did was look up his publications and the number of times each has been cited. I found it useful to know how many times each article was cited in this story. I'll attribute that comment to Baxter's ignorance of the importance of citations and how many people familiar with science found that information useful.

Comparing the number of citations to "finding one of his old lovers and asking her if he was good in the sack" is not only immature and nonsensical, but just weakens any argument, whatever it may be, that Baxter attempts to make.

As for the comment concerning Islamic nations - any person, from any country, should be investigated if something similar happens. There's no need to single out any race or nationality and make discriminatory comments that only breed hatred and racism.



some questions ok; article pointless
by Baxter Zappa

[Comment posted 2007-06-21 23:25:51]
There is nothing wrong with asking some questions to see why the son-in-law of a TB expert is running around with TB. Questions, not witch hunt. If someone from, for example, an Islamic nation, was running around the US for his wedding with XDR-TB, you would damn well want a serious investigation.

What's lame is this article. It could have been replaced by just its own title and been just as informative. Does it really matter how many times the guy's publications have been referenced? That's about as relevant to TB as finding one of his old lovers and asking her if he was good in the sack.



re Investing What
by Red Snapper

[Comment posted 2007-06-21 20:26:17]
C'mon, the guy knew his future son-in-law Andrew Speaker had at least MDR TB, that his daughter's wedding was in Europe, and that the CDC had advised Speaker maybe it wasn't a good idea to travel. It seems that as a public health official he could have at least explained the situation better to Speaker and his daughter and tried to persuade them to postpone the wedding. Plus after Speaker took off, Cooksey apparently wasn't helpful to the CDC in locating Speaker in Europe. Reportedly, it wasn't until Cooksey learned the TB was XDR that he helped the CDC to locate Speaker. Was he in contact at all with his daughter and son-in-law while they were traipsing all over Europe by air and boat, flying back to North America, and driving around in Canada? I think it's worth at least finding out what Cooksey told his daughter and Speaker before Speaker left, and whether he could have been more helpful in getting Speaker isolated after he had left the U.S.



Government hacs with nothing else to do!
by R.C.

[Comment posted 2007-06-21 20:09:12]
Of all the problems we have dealing with HIV/AIDS, STDs, antibiotic resistant microbes of all types and even the resurgence of M. tuberculosis, you would think that government types would have something better to do with their time than investigating a researcher that has contributed greatly to his field. I think the new montra in the government circles is investigate until you create a crime. I guess when you have a budget that is basically unlimited, you can waste money that would be better spent on research. To bad the CDC doesn't have to fight for grant money and funding like the rest of us.



Investigating what?
by Daniel Miller

[Comment posted 2007-06-21 18:55:04]
Why in the name of God does anyone think that there is anything worth investigating here? What exactly are they expecting to find? That the lawyer was deliberately infected before traveling overseas by his father-in-law? That his father-in-law deliberately sent him to get infected so that he would have a new strain to study? That his father-in-law wanted to bump him off because of the way he was running around on his wife? What is this all about?



The News


Front Cover

Register for FREE Online Access

  • »Current issue
  • »Best Places to Work and Salary surveys
  • »Daily news and monthly contents emails

Register »

Subscribe to the Magazine

  • »Monthly print issues
  • »Unlimited online access
  • »Special offers on books, apparel, and more

Subscribe »

Library Subscriptions
Recommend to a Librarian

Masthead | Contact | Advertise | Privacy Policy
© 1986-2012 The Scientist