Bookmark and Share

Pick your frog poison

Human development may destroy natural habitats, but it could also provide amphibians with a safe haven from deadly fungal infections


[Published 31st May 2011 02:20 PM GMT]


Amphibians that inhabit natural environments are more likely to be infected with the fatal Bd fungus that has devastated frog and salamander populations worldwide than those living in habitats disturbed by human development.

Extinct Monteverde golden toad
Image: Wikimedia commons, US Fish and Wildlife Service
The results, published yesterday (May 30) in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, challenge the assumption that habitat loss necessarily exacerbates the spread of disease.

"I don't think anyone will be going up in the mountains cutting down trees in the hopes of getting rid of Bd or anything," said Forrest Brem who researches amphibian epidemiology at the University of Memphis and was not involved in the research. "But I think this study will remind everyone how complex host-pathogen-environment systems are and encourage us to incorporate this complexity in their thinking, teaching, and research."

Bd (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis) is a member of the chytrid fungus family, which attacks some 350 amphibian species. In the last 15 years, it has caused massive declines of amphibian populations around the world, even driving some species to extinction. The fungus, spread by skin-to-skin contact or through the water, kills by causing the outer layer of skin to thicken and become less permeable to the water-borne electrolytes amphibians absorb to keep their hearts beating. And for those amphibians that absorb oxygen through their skin, a Bd infection suffocates them.

Since the international trade of amphibians as food, pets, and lab animals took off in the 1970s, Bd has passed to every continent that supports amphibian species. "It's spreading like a wave," said C. Guilherme Becker, a graduate student in ecology and evolutionary biology at Cornell University. "Especially in Central America and Australia."

In addition to the spread of Bd, amphibians across the globe are suffering from loss of habitat caused by human development. The combination of the disease and habitat loss is a "double threat," said Becker, and implementing successful future conservation efforts requires an understanding of interactions between these two forces.

To this end, he and his advisor, Kelly Zamudio, compared habitat loss and Bd infection data from tropical sites in Costa Rica (for the common rain frog) and in eastern Australia (for the Stony Creek frog). In contrast to past studies of other human and animal diseases, they found that the frogs in disturbed habitats were less likely to be infected. Field surveys of disturbed and natural habitats of the Golden Lesser Tree Frog in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest confirmed these findings.

Despite many studies showing that habitat disturbance increases disease in human and animal populations, in the case of Bd "it is not surprising that disease risk is higher in more natural habitats," Ross Alford, professor of tropical ecology at James Cook University in Australia who did not participate in the research, said in an email to The Scientist. Bd is very intolerant of the hot, dry environments that often result from habitat disturbance, he explained. Furthermore, natural environments support a greater number of hosts that could help spread the fungus, added Becker.

The three species studied, however, are habitat generalists that are relatively tolerant to human disturbance. But other species are not so hardy, and will either suffer from the changing habitat itself, or retreat to natural habitats, where Bd is more prevalent. "Disturbed habitats may act as shelters from disease, but only for the very few species that can tolerate deforestation," Becker and Zamudio wrote in their paper.

"This study contributes to our understanding of the interactions [of Bd with amphibians] and may well aid in thinking 'outside the box' in developing management tools," said Alford.

C.G. Becker and K.R. Zamudio, "Tropical amphibian populations experience higher disease risk in natural habitats," PNAS, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014497108, 2011.


Related stories:
  • Frog-killing fungus clues found
    [12th October 2009]
  • Q&A: Frog saver
    [15th May 2009]
  • Frog fungus spreads in Panama
    [17th October 2008]


  • Advertisement

     

    Rate this article

    Rating: 3.17/5 (46 votes )





    nice post
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2012-05-04 00:14:19]
    The scientist is the mode of living , who take things according to his intuition and creates a new mysterious machine.
    honeywell humidifier
    LINK



    Amazinng
    by dale aburks

    [Comment posted 2012-04-17 12:20:19]
    This is a good investigation regarding the Frogs and i have never though of this kind of poisonous elements in the frogs.
    Regards,
    early childhood development
    LINK



    Sad
    by dale aburks

    [Comment posted 2012-04-14 13:57:08]
    This is pretty sad news as many of the species are getting polluted due to the habitat change or because of the adaptation of other species that are affecting others.
    Regards,
    Roofing Contractor
    LINK



    good!
    by Nagelstudio Hamburg

    [Comment posted 2012-02-22 07:34:43]
    Very interesting to me! Thank you! LINK">Nageldesign Hamburg



    re
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2012-02-16 22:04:39]
    The information provided here is of the utmost quality. Appreciated for displaying the content in such a manner as of such when I?m
    LINK
    LINK
    LINK
    LINK
    LINK



    I am really glad that this fungus
    by Sherwin Chen

    [Comment posted 2012-02-05 20:45:35]
    I am really glad that this fungus does not affect dogs. I would not wish for something to happen to my pets if they came in contact with affect frogs or such. Though this research does show that some amphibians have a safe haven from the fungus after human development, I hope it doesn't justify human's destruction of the environment. The solution is not to destroy more, the solution is to find a way to counteract the fungus. Scientists should put their focus on finding a cure instead.

    Sherwin - LINK



    Hmmmm....
    by jeremiah davis

    [Comment posted 2011-06-03 17:05:53]
    I didn't realize anyone was saying habitat loss spread disease. If anything, it seems it would isolate various species, except that we are spreading the disease in this case across urban "land bridges."



    The News


    Front Cover

    Register for FREE Online Access

    • »Current issue
    • »Best Places to Work and Salary surveys
    • »Daily news and monthly contents emails

    Register »

    Subscribe to the Magazine

    • »Monthly print issues
    • »Unlimited online access
    • »Special offers on books, apparel, and more

    Subscribe »

    Library Subscriptions
    Recommend to a Librarian

    Masthead | Contact | Advertise | Privacy Policy
    © 1986-2012 The Scientist