Bookmark and Share

Arsenic supports life?

The toxic element might be able to replace phosphorus to support microbial growth, casting doubt on the belief phosphorus is essential to life


[Published 2nd December 2010 05:22 PM GMT]


A strain of bacteria isolated from a salt lake in California can grow on arsenic, seemingly in lieu of phosphorus in its DNA and other major biomolecules.

Mono Lake, California
Image: Image © 2010 Henry Bortman
The finding, published today (December 2) on the Science Express Web site, throws into doubt the long-held belief that phosphorus is absolutely essential to life, and broadens the range of environments in which scientists might expect to find extraterrestrial organisms.

"This is a surprise," said biochemist Barry Rosen of Florida International University, who was not involved in the research. "Not just for bacteria but for life in general, arsenic is one of the few elements that is considered to be only toxic and has no role in metabolism."

It's "pretty damn surprising," agreed ecologist James Elser of the Arizona State University, who also did not participate in the study. "I've spent my career studying phosphorus limitation, and how organisms use phosphorus, and how nucleic acids always have phosphorus in them, and now there's this exception. That's what's really weird."

Arsenic falls directly below phosphorus on the period table, and thus has many similar chemical properties. In contrast to relatively stable phosphorus-based molecules, however, arsenic compounds are extremely unstable. While phosphorus compounds take years, decades, or even millennia to break down, the rate of hydrolysis of arsenic compounds is usually measured in seconds or minutes.

In fact, its similarity to phosphorus and its instability partly explains why arsenic is so toxic. The body may not be able to distinguish between phosphate -- the most common form of phosphorus in organisms -- and its arsenic equivalent, arsenate. As a result, scientists suspect that arsenate can be incorporated into molecules and pathways that normally use phosphate, causing downstream processes to fail if the arsenate molecules are quick to break down or otherwise don't work properly.

But at least one organism seems to have tackled this problem. Sampling the sediment of Mono Lake in California, a salt lake with high dissolved arsenic concentrations, NASA astrobiologist Felisa Wolfe-Simon of the US Geological Survey and her colleagues identified a bacterium that can grow when cultured with arsenic, but only trace amounts of phosphorus. Under conditions of high arsenic, the bacteria didn't grow as well as when phosphorus was abundantly available, but they grew significantly more than when neither arsenic nor phosphorus was provided.

"That says, to me, that they really are using the arsenic," Rosen said.

To determine how the bacteria used the normally toxic element, the researchers provided the cultures with radiolabeled arsenic, and found it in parts of the cell containing proteins, metabolites, lipids and nucleic acids. Further analysis of the DNA suggested that the arsenic might simply be replacing the phosphorus in the backbone of the molecule atom-for-atom.

Scanning electron micrograph of the bacterial strain isolated from Mono Lake under high arsenic, low phosphorus conditions.
Image courtesy of Science/AAAS
"The challenge then is to explain how it is conceivable [that] an organism is able to use [arsenic] in its genetic molecules," given that they fall apart so quickly, said astrobiologist Steven Benner of the Westheimer Institute at the Foundation for Applied Molecular Evolution, who was not involved in the research. One possibility, he suggested, is that interacting, as-yet unknown molecules stabilize the arsenic-based compounds, but first more research is needed to confirm how the arsenic is being incorporated into DNA and other molecules.

"They show that arsenic is in the DNA, but they don't show that it is participating in the backbone, replacing phosphate," Rosen said. "To be truly convincing, I'd like to see an actual molecule that has arsenic that is active and functional."

If arsenic is indeed serving as a surrogate for phosphorus under certain conditions, however, "the result will have sweeping consequences," said Benner, who served on a discussion panel today at a NASA news conference about the study. "It will overturn a century of information about the comparative behavior of phosphates and arsenates."

Another open question is whether or not these bacteria are using arsenic in their natural habitat of Mono Lake, said Elser, also a member of today's discussion panel. The experiments demonstrate that the microbes are capable of growing on arsenic, but these are contrived laboratory experiments. "The only way to answer that question is to get in a field situation and [use] radiolabeled arsenic under more realistic field conditions," he said.

Felisa Wolfe-Simon collects samples from Mono Lake.
Image: Image ? 2010 Henry Bortman
The results raise some obvious questions about the chemical environments that might be able to support life, and expand the search for environments that contain extraterrestrial life. Additionally, the bizarre bacteria may provide some creative solutions to some critical problems. Because arsenic is a toxic and quite prevalent contaminant, for example, scientists are always looking for ways to remove it from the environment, Rosen said. "If we could devise organisms that could capture and accumulate the arsenic, it might be possible to use those for bioremediation."

Another potential application for an arsenic-loving microbe is in phosphorus recycling, Elser said. "Phosphorus for agriculture is going to start running out in a few decades," he said, and bacteria that use arsenic instead could help keep vital ecosystems running. (Click here to read last month's feature about Elser's work on the potential effects of a worldwide phosphorus shortage.)

"Those are just science fiction applications that now pop into mind now that we think there is an organism that might not really need phosphorus," Elser added, "which is just shocking for me to say."



F. Wolfe-Simon, et al., "A bacterium that can grow by using arsenic instead of phosphorus," Science Express, 10.1126/science.1197258, 2010.


Related stories:
  • Elemental Shortage
    [November 2010]
  • A matter of chow
    [March 2009]
  • Arsenic and old...photosynthesis?
    [14th August 2008]


  • Advertisement

     

    Rate this article

    Rating: 3.90/5 (62 votes )





    Sometimes discoveries like this make
    by Joseph Brown

    [Comment posted 2012-02-09 02:12:50]
    Sometimes discoveries like this make me wonder about extraterrestrial life, because how sure are we that they have the same ?elements? as us on their planet? For all we know, they are invisible to our human eyes, and nobody can be sure whether they exist.



    An adaptation of the genetic material (DNA) which does not effect the genetic information (DNA sequence)
    by Meeta Rani Mannaert ᅠᅠ[Not You?
    [Comment posted 2010-12-27 16:50:44]
    Using arsenic instead of phosphorus would just change the non-genetic structural aspect of DNA. It does not destabilize the DNA structure though may modify some structural parameters. The bacteria's genetics would not change as it is based on the sequence of its nucleotides- the sequence of A, T, G, C. So the genetics should not be effected whether the DNA has phosphorus or something else. It is likely that in the course of evolution, phosphorus happened to be picked up for this purpose due to its easy availability and structural functionality. But this is not so in the case of the "Alien bacteria" as it grows in an arsenic rich environment. This appears to be an adaptation. NASA should further test whether this curious "Alien" would even adapt to normalcy when grown exclusively in presence of phosphorus. If there is indeed any reversion to using phosphorus then we can be sure that this is an adaptation. This return to using phosphorus would then be seen in a few bacteria who survive by adaptation- just like emergence of a few antibiotic resistant bacteria in an environment containing antibiotics.



    Interesting
    by RON HANSING

    [Comment posted 2010-12-06 09:47:45]
    First, why do you publish anonymous letters. If you have a grip be the mensch and use your name.

    I do think the article deserved publishing in a peer review journal; albeit, it preliminary data and of course more research is needed but there is a spark that just might be relevant. And that is important. I get the feeling from reading some of the letters that there is a hint of jealousy that if the research pans out, it will be a Nobel Prize consideration.

    Second, I do not agree that the research is PR and Hype. Yes, there is a lot that can be criticized, but that?s why we publish, to gather feedback and ponder future research.

    Show me any solitary scientific article and I can with not too much effort rip it apart. That?s why Science needs to be independently collaborated, and future research substantiates or modifies the original claims. We have to start somewhere and this article is a good worthy beginning

    Ron Hansing 12.6.10



    shameful science
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2010-12-05 19:26:29]
    This article has been completely debunked.

    Microbiology critique,

    LINK

    chemistry critique,

    LINK



    Multiple enzyme naturally resistant to arsenate?
    by Greg Pahel

    [Comment posted 2010-12-04 08:25:50]
    This is one that needs very careful vetting. Back in the old days of doing heavy element labeling it took slow adaptation to get bacteria to grow on heavy nitrogen and even then the growth rate was severely slowed. This is just adding one mass unit to the nitrogen. If these bacteria truly have this capability then I would expect that in their natural environment they would have some arsenic incorporated. Is resistance to arsenate in their native environment based on keeping the arsenate out, or converting it to a non-toxic derivative or is every one of the myriad enzymes that utilize phosphate and phosphate derivatives already resistant to what is normally a very potent competitive inhibitor. Adenosine tri-arsenate as the basis of energy transfer? I very much doubt it.



    Exciting news but long way to go.
    by Nitin Gandhi

    [Comment posted 2010-12-03 22:10:40]
    This news was exciting, however to prove that As has replaced P is far fetched. With the improved technique in purification and analysis, I fail to understand why was there so much hurry to publish the immature results? one can work for few more months and make the solid claims on either side.

    Secondly, is there any experiments to show that the more length and breadth of microorganisms are NOT incorporating As? and resist the toxicity? has any one proved that?

    Thirdly: if the isolated organism is evolved to take (and replace As) into its cellular components including the DNA, then my common sense tells that no matter what it will NOT revert back to taking P even if there is absence of As and excess of P, (even if Lion gets too old to hunt it will NOT start eating grass!)

    Lastly I hope that the claims made are found to be true, it will give the moral boosting to the entire field of (biomedical) science in general and NASA astrobiology programe in particular.

    Otherwise (American) science will suffer more, which is already loosing the glory, output and reputation.








    Not at all Surprising...!!!!!
    by Dr HP Pandey

    [Comment posted 2010-12-03 20:22:32]
    Arsenic supports life...is not at all surprising, because in Homeopathic System of medications Arsenic is widely used as a Life Saving Drug to cure several chronic diseases. This finding is an indication, rather testimony for the homeopathic use of Arsenic in different dilutions. The scientists who surprise should go through Materia Medica of Homeopathic medicines for more information.



    Very Doubtful...but hopeful new chemistry might be revealed
    by null null

    [Comment posted 2010-12-03 14:03:25]
    Doubtful!
    Arsenate esters are well known to form spontaneously and reversibly in aqueous media. This fact is used by organic chemists to circumvent the need of synthesizing phosphorylated substrates required by many enzymes like D-fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase. This enzyme requires dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP) as the donor reactant. However, if you simply mix dihydroxyacetone with arsenate?whammo, you get spontaneous and reversible formation of dihydroxyacetone arsenate that can then be utilized by the enzyme. Perhaps the organism is using arsenate in a role such as this but I really don?t see how it could make stable DNA wherein phosphate is replaced with arsenate. If it is used in the organisms DNA, then there is certainly some fascinating counter intuitive chemistry to be learned. Until a few simple and telling experiments are performed, I?ll remain doubtful. Not sure how this article was published without these telling and obvious experiments. Would be cool if I were wrong here.

    Carlos F. Barbas
    The Scripps Research Institute


    For a few of the many examples where spontaneous arsenate ester formation is used to produce unstable yet useful phospho-mimics see:

    Durrwachter, J. R.; Drueckhammer, D. G.; Nozaki, K.; Sweers, H.; Wong, C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 7812-7818.
    Drueckhammer, D. G.; Durrwachter, J. R.; Pederson, R. L.;Crans, D. C.; Daniels, L.; Wong, C.-H. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 70-77.



    another cold fusion?
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2010-12-03 13:30:51]
    The various claims authors make in this paper are based on indirect measurements and/or numerous convoluted assumptions. For example, the size of the genome for the isolated bacterial strain is unknown. The authors use in their calculations the average size of genomes of several known bacterial species (for which the individual values differ probably by an order of magnitude). Even more importantly, the chemical structures in which the detected arsenic is presumably engaged remain unknown. Moreover, no attempt was made to further fractionate nucleic acids and determine As levels separately in DNA and RNA. Yet, the authors make their farfetched conjectures about As substituting P in the genome.
    Some aspects of arsenic chemistry that are critical to the interpretation of the results are ignored. Extensive literature exists on the binding of arsenic compounds to cellular protein (through protein sulfhydryls). Such a binding can be expected in any organism exposed to As. It remains unclear what portion of the detected As was in such conjugates (and should be subtracted from all the estimates of the putative P to As substitutions).
    It is surprising that some obvious controls are omitted. For example, the efficiency of the cleanup/fractionation procedures to remove merely occluded 75As should be verified. This could be done, e.g., by spiking a lysate from cells without radiolabeled As with appropriate amount of 75As before fractionation/cleanup. Similarly, if arsenic were indeed to substitute phosphorus in the macromolecules, a standard approach would be to do a competition experiment - a control culture with medium containing both 75As and phosphate. Phosphate in the medium should attenuate any specific arsenium incorporation as a phosphorus substitute but would be unlikely to affect the background levels of non-specific radioactivity as well as direct arsenic binding to biomolecules (without substituting for phosphorus).
    Perhaps the authors (as well as the manuscript reviewers) were somewhat too eager to get these preliminary observations published quickly.



    Why we interview people who are "not involved" in the research
    by Alison McCook

    [Comment posted 2010-12-03 12:51:06]
    Thanks for your question -- we always speak to experts who were not involved in the current research, to get their take on the findings. This is why you often see us quote people who were "not involved in the current study."

    Thanks,

    Alison McCook, News Editor



    An Insult to Well-Trained Scientists
    by eve barak

    [Comment posted 2010-12-03 12:36:31]
    I am pleased to see that some of the commentators are drawing attention to the devastatingly complete lack of scientific rigor underpinning this "discovery."

    It is really frightening to think that:

    1 - A reputable "peer reviewed" journal would publish the work without adequate supporting data.
    2 - The Scientist would report on it with only a minimal nod to the inadequacy of the supporting data (i.e., the quote from Barry Rosen).
    3 - Madison-Avenue-style PR determines what kind of "science" the American people learn.
    4 - Nobody in the communications media seems to have adequate general understanding of the process of science, nor do any of them seem to care -- so long as they can sell newspapers and TV ads.
    AND
    5 - the most frightening of all -- that our government labs (in this case, NASA) are staffed with scientists who either don't know what they're doing, or don't care. These are the labs that our legislators and executive branch turn to for advice on policy matters involving science. Truly frightening.



    Inconclusive data
    by Roger Rowlett

    [Comment posted 2010-12-03 12:13:01]
    Unfortunately, the data as reported, while *consistent*, is not *sufficient* to convincingly prove the incoporation of As into biological molecules. Too much press, too little science. The X-ray data really only show the presence of As(V), which is consistent with aresnate ion as well as arsenate-labeled biomolelcules. Furthermore, the rationalization that the arsenates are stabilized in the cell by the *hypothesized* presence of poly-beta-hydroxybutyrate is not sufficiently supported in the paper by hard data or by chemical precedent. Can the activity of water really be lowered enough to slow the hydrolysis of arsenate esters to that comparable to phosphate?

    Want to be convincing? Isolate and purify an actual biomolecule (aresenoprotein, arseno-nucleotide or nucleic acid, arsenolipid) and characterize it with an method capable of distinguishing arsenate from an arseno-compound. NMR, XRD, MS, something else conclusive. Please.

    Convincing data was collected (XRD, EXAFS on purified protein) to demonstrate the presence of cadmium in the first known cadmium metalloenzyme. A similar approach should be done here, if arseno-biomolecules are really as stable as hypothesized.



    Skeptical as well
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2010-12-03 11:56:32]
    There must be some massive politics involved in this article's publication. Science is really going down the tubes.
    Look at the data in Table 2. Where's the negative control showing that 11% radiolabel recovered in the "DNA fraction" won't also happen with phosphorus-fed bugs? Also, "DNA fraction" is in quotations because if you look Figure 2a shows massively different profiles of nucleic acid isolation results between As+ and As- bacteria. You can't possible compare those. For some reason it seems As inhibits recovery of RNA.
    Anyway, I agree with others that this bacterium is surviving in the arsenic and likely sequestering it in the giant vacuole found in this treatment; but we're still far off from seeing arsenic's actual incorporation into biomolecules.



    Show me the molecule
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2010-12-03 11:32:55]
    I also am skeptical. Extraordinary conclusions call for extraordinarily thorough documentation.



    Too Much Hype
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2010-12-03 11:20:36]
    I agree with Mavi Gozler. The News People are getting ahead of the science. This interesting observation of bacteria who live in the presence of arsenic needs more testing to understand what is really happening. Using Occam's razor, it is more likely that the bacteria is able to protect itself from arsenic's toxicity. Otherwise, the bacteria would need to have created a whole new set of enzymes & stablizing proteins to allow the substitution of Aresenic for phosphorus in biomolecules. Given the known instability of arsenic organic compounds, this would be quite an evolutionary feat.



    Or This Might Be Biochemistry's "Cold Fusion" Moment
    by Mavi Gozler

    [Comment posted 2010-12-03 10:29:39]
    I am bit surprised that no commenter has expressed monumental skepticism.

    Allow me to be the skeptic until all the analyses are complete. I think we all remember how incredulous we were when the "cold fusion breakthrough" was announced a couple of decades ago.

    Principles of physics and chemistry cannot be defied so long as those principles have been firmly tested countless times and rooted in our understanding. If arsenate can indeed replace phosphate in the fundamental biomolecules to form a viable organism with humming-along homeostasis, this is the discovery of a generation, maybe two generations.

    I missed the link to the peer-reviewed article in which the "DNA" (if it is that) was isolated and characterized as to whether it possesses cytosine, guanine, adenine, and thymine...and even if they are on ribose. We are led to believe there is no phosphate! And what about proteins: are they the 20 amino acids we know of...? And clearly kinases of these proteins arsenylate rather than phosphorylate?

    I am inclined to believe that this organism lives in spite of the presence of arsenate, and not because of it, and it finds a way to sequester it, perhaps to exploit it in limited ways.



    Not Involved
    by Robert Spencer

    [Comment posted 2010-12-03 10:10:39]
    Can someone explain why you always interview someone "who was not involved" in the study?



    NASA
    by Joe Greig

    [Comment posted 2010-12-03 08:44:39]
    Though not a professional scientist, I am in agreement with John Collins. I saw the NASA report on TV and it seemed that the science was subordinated to PR for looking for extra terrestrial life.



    Too surprising
    by JOHN COLLINS

    [Comment posted 2010-12-03 06:15:28]
    Considering the rare evolutionary events that have allowed selenium or molybdenum to be incorporated into a handful of rare enzymes to carry out extreme oxido-reduction reactions it is completely amazing, should we say unbelievable, to suggest that arsenic has replaced phosphate and its functionality in a living cell. Coping with toxicity by special sequestering of arsenic is another matter. I am surprised more by the fact that these flimsy findings are touted under the heading of support for theories of life forms based on arsenic instead of phosphorus.



    Not too surprising
    by Santosh Bhaskaran

    [Comment posted 2010-12-02 22:01:26]
    It is not too surprising or shocking by this discovery.
    Forgetting philosophy, life is just a set of chemical reactions (not completely known) which can multiply under certain physical conditions. Hence life based on arsenic or any other element in the periodic table is possible. Carbon can be replaced by silicon, oxygen by sulphur, etc. since they share the same place in the periodic table and therefore have similar properties.
    Same is the case for life in any physical or chemical environments. It is just that the chemicals (and hence set of chemical reactions) could be different.



    Clean up water
    by HIMADRI SAMANTA

    [Comment posted 2010-12-02 14:45:34]
    I was wondering if one take advantage of the bacteria to clean up the arsenic contaminated ground water in Bangladesh and eastern part of India



    Origin of Life?
    by Mike Waldrep

    [Comment posted 2010-12-02 14:21:23]
    Interesting!



    Is this a new finding?
    by HAO BO GUO

    [Comment posted 2010-12-02 13:33:09]
    At least 9 years ago there had been a publication in Nature (Ma et al. 2001, 409, 579) indicated that a fern bioaccumulates arsenic. It is not surprising that As behaves as P, since both elements are closely related. In their book 'The Biological Chemistry of the Elements', Frausto da Silva and Williams also pointed out that As is a possibly essential elements for some species, e.g., Brown agae, Ferns and P.vittata in plants, or coelenterates in animals.



    The News


    Front Cover

    Register for FREE Online Access

    • »Current issue
    • »Best Places to Work and Salary surveys
    • »Daily news and monthly contents emails

    Register »

    Subscribe to the Magazine

    • »Monthly print issues
    • »Unlimited online access
    • »Special offers on books, apparel, and more

    Subscribe »

    Library Subscriptions
    Recommend to a Librarian

    Masthead | Contact | Advertise | Privacy Policy
    © 1986-2012 The Scientist