![]() |
For those who are employed in a non-research position, consider ways -- perhaps through career fairs or by visiting your degree-granting institution/department -- to discuss your experiences, how you got where you are today, and the benefits that you see in your career choice versus the research track; be a resource for the next generation of alternative career-seekers. I am practicing what I preach by, for example, writing and volunteering to discuss my educational and research and post-research experience with college students at my undergraduate institution.
Employers seeking out PhDs for non-research positions should be doing more to recruit others into these positions, and should encourage their PhD employees to participate. Employers should also devise strategies to highlight the unique and important contributions that non-research PhD employees are making; touting the achievements of current employees would generate more interest from individuals considering a pursuit of a non-research career.
Employers are luring PhDs away from research by, for example, sending recruiting and/or human resource specialists to career fairs. But, why not allow current alternative career PhD employees to participate in these events? Let the people doing the work speak to recruits in order to provide a firsthand account of the benefits both the employer and employee are experiencing.
Support is available to those of us who are interested in alternative careers. Research journals, such as Science and Nature, and science magazines, such as The Scientist, are doing a great job in acting as a forum for discussions on alternative careers and in announcing and participating in career fairs and workshops.
Ultimately, we all have to take control of our own career path. However, despite our best intentions and efforts, there are forces that can prevent or delay career success. PhDs are making great contributions to science through non-research careers. These careers are rewarding especially for those who indeed love science but do not love hands-on research. The new generation of PhDs shouldn't have to struggle to gain access to a non-research career path if they are so inclined. Academic programs, mentors, alternative career employees and their employers -- everyone regardless of status, position, and sector -- should do more to respect, encourage and support the career pursuits of others.
Vanderford earned a PhD in biochemistry from the University of Kentucky, completed a one-year postdoctoral fellowship at Vanderbilt University, and is now pursuing a career in research/science administration.
Related stories:
[17th March 2010]
[1st August 2005]
[1st February 1999]


[Comment posted 2010-05-18 01:32:30]
I myself finished my PhD only last year and I would really have liked to be informed of the posibilities out there. It seems logical for all that you carry out a postdoc and ultimately this leads to a professorship. However, this is not likely for most of us and we might not be motivated to this.
I would like to combine my scientific skills with other disciplines. But the information in scarce and I think people are not really open for this (yet).
The safe option is just to continue with real science. It's a pity, though, because I think people with a background like ours, working in other fields, could really contribute with an alternative view on things and therefore be innovative in other fields.
If you have any info on "alternative career paths" then please let me know!
[Comment posted 2010-05-17 13:06:29]
[Comment posted 2010-05-17 12:45:11]
But encouragement only goes so far. Yes, it is clear that for some of the other careers in science, a person will have to dedicate additional resources (money, time) to gain experience. But even with that, there is no guarantee that you will get the position. I want to get into Regulatory Affairs. I asked on a number of forums whether getting RAC is useful and majority answered no. But you can't get into Regulatory Affairs without having the experience. So, encouraging should go hand in hand with enabling!
[Comment posted 2010-05-17 10:57:27]
[Comment posted 2010-05-17 09:04:28]
[Comment posted 2010-05-15 06:03:40]
"...the qualifications required of a scientist are so specialized and time-consuming that they do not qualify him to take up any other occupation. ... several scientists have told me with an air of delighted wonderment how very satisfactory it is that they should be paid ? perhaps even adequately paid ? for work so absorbing and deeply pleasurable as scientific research. ["Advice to a Young Scientist", SIR PETER MEDAWAR, FRS. New Scientist vol.85 (28 Feb 1980) p664]
[Comment posted 2010-05-14 10:48:07]
[Comment posted 2010-05-13 12:21:54]