It's an old story - highly trained female scientists get NIH funding, but quit before starting their own labs. Last week, Science reported an analysis of NIH grant data that yet again showed women trailing men at the highest stations in biomedical science. But what kind of programs out there reverse this trend?
We want to hear from readers about the programs that have made a difference in women's careers in science. From mentors to creative day care solutions to government grants that made going back to lab easier, we want to know about the things that have had the biggest impact in women's lives. We'll use your suggestions in a Careers article for women in science.
Last year we asked our readers to brainstorm ways to keep women in science. Many of you responded with suggestions, some of which we published in our January 2007 Careers article. This year we want to go further and highlight the best and worst of programs for women.
Leave a comment to this post to tell us about programs you know -- the good and the bad.

[Comment posted 2008-12-12 11:09:13]
The Grace Hopper Celebration is a technical conference that also has at its core the mission to help women network and provide each other professional support. This year's Recession proofing your career segment included a 400 attendee speed networking session. In addition the conference staff works to make sure that every woman attending is able to maximize her networking time with numerous breaks, a career fair with leading technology companies and onsite fully funded child care. Numerous women attendees have told us that without the onsite free child care they would never have been able to attend. GHC also offers scholarships for attendees from around the world.
I encourage everyone to check out the Conference at www.gracehopper.org to see how a technical conference can make a difference in women's careers.
[Comment posted 2008-12-11 08:15:51]
[Comment posted 2008-12-10 13:51:18]
L. Frehill
[Comment posted 2008-12-09 13:38:08]
I would advocate programs for keeping the best people in science, period, without regard to sex, color, or anything else. The question is, how to administer them. Do we start in grad school with GPA and weight from there? Do we weight it for creativity? I think we must make strenuous efforts to make sure that every graduate student and post-doc gets treated fairly to start. I think that we must make efforts to deliberatly cull graduate students and post-docs who are lousy as well.
Seriously, how do we do this? How do we fix what is more and more broken in science?
[Comment posted 2008-12-09 12:30:40]
Investigate and do a story on her program.
D.M. Jarzen