Tens of thousands of species migrate, and the journeys they take are as different as the creatures themselves. Arctic terns migrate from their nesting grounds in the Bering Sea to the Antarctic Ocean, a circumpolar voyage of 35,000 kilometers that may be without equal in the animal kingdom. At the other extreme, spotted salamanders in Maine awake from their winter hibernation in abandoned shrew burrows and trek 135 meters or so across the forest floor to their breeding ponds.
Some species of birds and sea turtles appear to follow an invisible roadmap created by the earth's magnetic field. Other animals rely on landmarks such as mountain ranges and coastlines, the alignment of the stars in the night sky, or olfactory cues to determine where they're going. And for plenty of species, we simply don't know how they find their way.
What we do know is that migration has become an increasingly dangerous journey for many species, resulting in greatly diminished populations. Radar images of flocks of migratory songbirds crossing the Gulf of Mexico in the springtime show a 50 percent drop in the number of flocks between the mid-1960s and the late 1980s. By studying historical records, biologist Joel Berger has calculated that the number of migratory routes used by elk and pronghorn in the Yellowstone region has declined by nearly 60 percent and 80 percent, respectively. The number of salmon swimming up the Columbia River each year to spawn has dropped by more than 90 percent since the time of Lewis and Clark, and most of the fish that make the journey today are produced in hatcheries, not in the wild.
The primary threats to animal migrations are habitat destruction, physical obstacles, overexploitation, and climate change. Habitat destruction, often described as the primary threat to biodiversity in general, is an especially serious threat to migratory species because it can happen anywhere on the breeding grounds, winter grounds, or the stopover sites in between. Obstacles to migration -- ranging from hydroelectric dams for fish to cell towers for bats to barbed-wire fences for antelope -- impede or stop an animal's journey. Not surprisingly, in a world of growing affluence and technological sophistication, more and more of the passageways for wildlife are being obstructed or destroyed.
And then there are the political hurdles conservationists face in their efforts to protect migratory species. Migratory animals cross borders with abandon, yet those borders demarcate independent nations, states, agencies, institutions, and cultures that somehow must coordinate their conservation efforts if the species is to prosper. A Swainson's thrush migrating from its wintering grounds in Brazil to its breeding grounds in Manitoba will pass through (or over) ten different countries and more than forty states, provinces, departments, and other major subnational jurisdictions, not to mention countless cities, towns, and villages.
The newest threat to migration is global climate change. It holds the potential to erase key habitats for certain species, such as the nesting beaches of sea turtles. It may also disrupt the carefully timed movements of predators and prey. For example, in the Netherlands, scientists have attributed a recent, sharp decline in the population of pied flycatchers to the fact that caterpillars, which the birds feed to their nestlings, are appearing earlier and earlier in the spring. Now, by the time the flycatchers have returned from their wintering grounds in Africa, set up their territories, and hatched their eggs, the peak of the caterpillar emergence has passed.
Across the world, then, animal migrations are diminishing in number and splendor. The irony is that just as the phenomenon of migration is slipping away, we are entering a golden age for studying it, thanks to advances in science and technology. Transmitters weighing less than a dime can now be attached to creatures as small as a thrush, while larger transmitters capable of communicating with satellites have already been attached to everything from great white sharks to polar bears to whooping cranes.
Almost every aspect of migration inspires awe: the incredible journeys migratory animals undertake and the hardships they face along the way; the complex mechanisms they use to navigate across the land and through the skies and seas; the increasingly sophisticated tools with which scientists study them; and, not least, the perseverance of the people striving to save these animals in the face of a more congested, inhospitable world. It all adds up to one of the most daunting yet rewarding challenges in wildlife conservation.
David Wilcove is professor of ecology, evolutionary biology, and public affairs at Princeton University, where he studies the conservation of biodiversity. His book, No Way Home: The Decline of the World's Great Animal Migrations, was published this year by Island Press.
David S. Wilcove
mail@the-scientist.com
Links within this article:
B. Grant, "Cataloguing life," The Scientist, December 1, 2007.
http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/53881/
A. Gawrylewski, "Opening Pandora's locks," The Scientist, October 1, 2007.
http://www.the-scientist.com/2007/10/1/46/1/
A. Harding, "Iraq's marshes return," The Scientist, August 1, 2006.
http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/24069/
P. Woodworth, "What price ecological restoration?" The Scientist, April 1, 2006.
http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/23277/
L.M. Silver, "A nasty mother," The Scientist, July 1, 2006.
http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/23827/
D.S. Wilcove, No Way Home: The decline of the world's great animal migrations, Island Press.
http://www.islandpress.org/books/detail.html/SKU/1-55963-985-7

[Comment posted 2007-12-11 01:27:52]
[Comment posted 2007-12-10 15:10:35]
[Comment posted 2007-12-09 01:52:16]
We may be investing in eliminating obvious answers to the problems because the sources that fund eliminating obvious reasons may prefer to redirect our attention away from the obvious with funding to protect corporate interests.
The interesting thing about migratory animals is that now that the earth is being destroyed with vast microwave use. The earths magnetic field is really out of kilter with the inhabitants and environment, and animals are suffering to the point of extinction. Obviously it takes the earth's magnetic field to power up the vast use of microwave technology. The Bible says that Jehovah takes care of the migratory animals and even feeds them. The bible also says that Jehovah puts it in our hearts to want to live forever, but with our earth out of whack with Jehovah's rightful direction humans inborn timepiece to want to live forever is no different then migratory animals not knowing which way to travel. We are all headed in the wrong direction because excessive microwave technology alters elliptical waves even in our and animals brains getting off kilter because we are all subject to our environment whether we like it or not. If we think it is just the animals that have lost their sense of direction, take a good look at humans who seem to be in a buying and selling frenzy and they aren't even using all the junk they are madly purchasing.
Now say for instance, that Jehovah's influence does direct the migratory animals, as well as our sensible behaviors, well when the elliptical patterns of wave lengths is thrown off by microwave interference heating up and expanding wave lengths than we can see why animals are thrown off migratory patterns and why humans like the environment are heating up and acting in a frenzy. Both buying and selling and many, many acting strangely crazy with extreme behaviors.
Our environment is heating up and sweating, but at the same time regular weather patterns are being altered to either the sweating or drying conditions of the heated and expanded wave lengths. What do we need more examples for, we already have animal extinction, human extinction and environmental extinction in the makings, what does that leave.
Who ever is responsible for proliferating extreme microwave use is responsible for our obvious extreme conditions that are mounting daily. Could it be that scientists already calculated environmental collapse not unlike beehive collapse, and have up and decided to have a seed bank depository in the arctic so after they cause collapse of the environment they being far greater than Jehovah, can redesign the earth's environment void of any elements they worked so hard to collapse. The question is, did scientists do this or are greedy corporate interests the ones deciding this.
To answer this, you might agree corporations need scientists to really come up with the science to make it happen, but it is corporations with their untold investments that are actually buying out the scientists loyalties, which rightly belong to the best interest of all involved to not cause untold damages.
Obviously, the answer is to quit pretending areosal pollution is not caused by ellipitical heating and sweating by overuse of microwave technology. Why?
[Comment posted 2007-12-08 18:15:56]
You are not writing an article for your friends to read. Assume your readers are evil, conniving, polluting critics who will use every possible loophole in your logic to make YOU look like the bad guy. I say evil conniving etc. because that is what we are generally portrayed as.
I don't mind people with different opinions than I do, I just want a cohesive, convincing argument. You can support George W Bush, starting the war in Iraq, or legalizing illegal drugs, so long as you have, and state, logical reasons for believing so. State facts so we can't say "is not, I say so" "is too, I say so"
[Comment posted 2007-12-08 08:59:00]
The idea behind the claim that some birds and sea-turtles may use the earth's magnetic field to migrate, is the belief that individuals that migrate alone, and had never migrated before, posess an "instinctive" (genetically predetermined) knowledge of the route they need to take to migrate by using the earth's magnetic field. Acting on the basis of such presumed knowledge, can, therefore, become misleading, and even detrimental, when the magnetic poles change location.
[Comment posted 2007-12-07 20:09:40]
Those who can seriously believe that any sub-human animals use the earth's magnetic field to migrate, overlook one insurmountable problem: Any such species would have long become extinct, because the earth's magnetic poles keep moving, changing locations, and even undergoing complete reversals!
[Comment posted 2007-12-07 18:50:52]