Bookmark and Share

Cartooning science misuses

Union of Concerned Scientists online visitors pick their favorite cartoon to headline a 2008 calendar


[Published 31st July 2007 03:51 PM GMT]


A scientist sits at her bench, a microscope at hand. Behind her, five balding men in scruffy suits crouch together, peering over her shoulder. One wears the label "govt." The researcher tilts her eyes back. "'Scuse me fellows -- but you're blocking the light."

This drawing, by Matthew Shultz of Brooklyn, NY, is one of the 12 winning cartoons that address the government's misuse of science, presented in the Union of Concerned Scientists' 2008 calendar.

Cartoons are a natural tool to demonstrate misuse of science, says Michael Halpern, outreach coordinator for the scientific integrity program at UCS. There are "numerous professional cartoons on political interference in science, just because it's an absurd practice that's easy to lampoon through cartoons."

In the second annual contest, the organization received approximately 400 entries from artists who heard about the contest through the UCS network (150,000 strong), or invitations posted on art blogs and related Web sites. To narrow it down to 12 entries, the UCS relied on a panel of cartoonists: Dave Coverly, creator of the syndicated cartoon Speed Bump; the Washington Post's Tom Toles; Garry Trudeau, Pulitzer Prize-winning creator of the syndicated cartoon Doonesbury; and James McLeod, last year's winner of the UCS cartoon contest.

Once the judges narrowed the entries to the top 12, UCS polled its visitors for their favorite cartoon -- earning the contest the name "Science Idol." After logging almost 20,000 votes, the public selected a cartoon by Jesse Springer of Eugene, Oregon, as the winner. The image depicts a science brushing dirt off of the word "TRUTH," as a man with the title "federal govt" shovels dirt on top of the same word. For his success, Springer earned $500 and lunch with Toles, also a Pulitzer Prize winner.

The calendars cost $10, and can be purchased on the UCS Web site. The organization sold "a few thousand" last year, says Halpern. The calendars give people "a good laugh," he says, and keep the concept of scientific integrity in their minds year-round. "It's not an issue that comes and goes in a season. This is a persistent problem."

Click here to see a slideshow of the 2008 calendar winners.

Do you have a favorite? Tell us here.

Alison McCook
mail@the-scientist.com

Links within this article:

Science idol: The scientific integrity editorial cartoon contest
http://www.ucsusa.org/scientific_integrity/science_idol

A. McCook, "Sizing up Bush on science," The Scientist, October 1, 2006.
http://www.the-scientist.com/2006/10/1/32/1




Advertisement

 

Rate this article
  • Not currently rated. Be the first!
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Not currently rated. Be the first!





Process more important than the result
by Robert Pytl■k

[Comment posted 2007-08-11 07:07:42]
I understand that people from UCS are deeply concerned, even maybe humiliated by the fact that they still have to rely on research fundings from the government they hate so much ... I also deeply appreciate the fact that they have decided to air their frustration by a rather peaceful and non-violent "art-therapy" action. As the process of drawing cartoons was obviously more important for them than the quality of final products, I am not very surprized by the complete lack of wit and originality of most of the pictures displayed. By the way, if the ones we were shown are the best, how awful have to be the others? (For my part, I prefer not to know ...)



Originality unrewarded
by Inna Goldberg

[Comment posted 2007-08-08 10:07:08]
I appreciate everything that the UCS has done. I must say, though, that I was appalled that the most bland, unoriginal comic had won. Credit seems to go not to those who can exert imagination but to those who can produce the most mediocre, accesible, sum-average product.



Beyond the cartoons
by Aravindan Neelakandan

[Comment posted 2007-08-04 03:16:41]
Well The abuse of science has a long history. When British colonialists declared many Indian communities as 'criminal races', it had the blessing of scientific eugenics. Nazis abused the theory of evolution and Marxists abused evolution, anthropology and even cybernetics. So it is a two way road. Politicians abuse science and self-seeking scientists yield to the abuse. Lysenko is a case in point and a warning. I wish the cartoons have shown slices from history from brave scientists like Galileo to Darwin and pseudo-scientists like Lysenko and their relevance to the denial mode in a section of scientific community to the phenomenon of Global warming as they are encouraged by not just Bush administration but also elsewhere. Compared to general cartoons elsewhere they are a bit so loud and deny us the pleasure of 'Ohh there' feeling.



Anti-Aging Drug
by Rebecca Poon

[Comment posted 2007-08-03 15:24:17]
Number 9 of 12 by Phil Witte of Piedmont CA, on Fatalities Data and FDA approval of anti-aging drug



misinformation
by Craig Miller

[Comment posted 2007-08-03 15:01:43]
and "truth" is a close second place.



Efforts to politicize science
by Claudia Woodward-Rice

[Comment posted 2007-08-03 14:48:54]
Efforts to politicize science and control conclusions have been widely documented.

How is depicting these efforts in cartoons evidence of "bias" ?



Expected Bias
by Henry Boyter

[Comment posted 2007-08-03 13:44:26]
A political group having a contest on political cartoons. The left leaning results were predictable. When you can't laugh at yourself, it is not laughable.



The News


Front Cover

Register for FREE Online Access

  • »Current issue
  • »Best Places to Work and Salary surveys
  • »Daily news and monthly contents emails

Register »

Subscribe to the Magazine

  • »Monthly print issues
  • »Unlimited online access
  • »Special offers on books, apparel, and more

Subscribe »

Library Subscriptions
Recommend to a Librarian

Masthead | Contact | Advertise | Privacy Policy
© 1986-2012 The Scientist