Bookmark and Share

Fifteen months in an icebox

Filmmaker Jean Lemire weathers one of the world's cruelest climates to document the effects of global warming


[Published 15th June 2007 02:02 PM GMT]


Empty, frozen lands stretch as far as the eye can see. The wind rages, temperatures plummet. In a ship softly bobbing in the arctic waters, a biologist adds the following entry to his log: "To reach this state of grace and harmony, some sacrifice is required. For the members of our expedition, the price to pay is measured in months of isolation, far from loved ones and kept from a normal life."



Jean Lemire wrote that entry in January 2006, only four months into a 15 month trip, during which he and 12 other people lived on a 51-metre long sailboat and shot 600 hours of film to capture how climate change is changing the Antarctic.

The Sedna IV - a three-masted sailboat with a range of 10,000 nautical miles, and fitted with high-definition filmmaking equipment and a cutting room - set off in September 2005 from the port at Cap-aux-Meules, in the Magdalen islands, Quebec, sailed through the Northwest passage, stopped in Buenos Aires, worked its way around Cape Horn, then reached the Antarctic Peninsula in January, 2006.

The Montreal-based documentary filmmaker's crew included biologist Pascale Otis, who studied avian adaptation to cold, and Ricardo Sahade, from the Universidad de C￳rdoba, Argentina, who studied changes in the benthic community.

Lemire set out to visit every research station on the Antarctic Peninsula. After talking with all the scientists working there over the summer, Lemire realized that everybody was leaving for the winter, when temperatures fall, angry winds swirl, and sunlight disappears. But Lemire wanted to see how climate change affects the region's winter, so in March 2006, as scientists abandoned their research stations for the cruel winter, the Sedna IV dropped anchor.

During an interview with Lemire, a handsome and friendly person at ease with telling a story, he calls the decision to stay through the winter "the big challenge." But very revealing -- "We were supposed to be stuck in the ice," says Lemire, "but we had no ice" due to the rise in temperature. That changes everything in the region, he says, since seals need the ice to give birth and other animals that normally leave because of the ice stayed all winter. "Some species, like Adelie penguins, are paying a big price for this change."

Lemire says he was very surprised to see the lack of ice, which only arrived very late in August. "All around, it was open water," he says.

Open water got very lonely. "After one year, time was passing very slowly," says Lemire, who was by then missing his friends and family. "But the most difficult part was June and July, with long nights of 20 hours of darkness."

But one long night was broken with dangerous excitement. On May 8, 2006, a violent storm burst the mooring line of the Sedna IV. Hours later, new waves broke the six port-side mooring lines and forced the crew to evacuate the bay by cutting the starboard mooring lines and steering the Sedna IV between the rocky shoals of the harbor. The captain had left the boat once it anchored, so Lemire had to sail the boat to safety himself. "We were very lucky," says Lemire.

Born in Drummondville, Quebec, Lemire studied biology as an undergrad at Sherbrooke University and was in the Ph.D. program at Laval University. "I was supposed to finish my thesis but never found the time to write it," says Lemire. "I started to do research and started a parallel life in the movie business."

In 1987, Lemire began a move toward documentary filmmaking when he formed the company Les Productions Cin←-Bio, followed by Glacialis Productions Inc. in 2001. His films and productions include Marine Mammals Mission (1994), Encounters with the Whales of the St. Laurence (1996), The Last Frontier (1998) and Arctic Mission (2004).

Last week, Lemire, 45, received a lifetime achievement award from the Canadian Environment Awards. Eventually, his footage from the Antarctica trip will make its way into a feature film and television series.

"I'm a biologist and I wanted to be able to become what other scientists call me now, the missing link between science and the public," Lemire says. "Instead of doing the science myself, I bring scientists with me and try to make stories about what they are doing and what they are thinking," he says. "And it is through this emotion that we can really touch the public."

David Secko
mail@the-scientist.com

Images: A penguin visit, the first hockey match in the Antarctic, the group gathers around the ice, an iceberg reflected, seals.

Links with this article

The Antarctic Mission, Ship's Log, January 12th 2006
http://www.radio-canada.ca/sedna/index.html?p=/eng/mission/contact.php

Pascale Otis
http://www.radio-canada.ca/sedna/index.html?p=/eng/crew/otis.php

Glacialis Productions Inc.
http://www.glacialis.tv

Canadian Environment Awards 2007
http://www.canadiangeographic.ca/cea2007/home.asp

E. Zielinska, "Extreme science caught on film," The Scientist, January 19, 2007.
http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/42343







Advertisement

 

Rate this article

Rating: 3.00/5 (2 votes )





Not global warming -just wind pattern changes
by Eduardo Ferreyra

[Comment posted 2007-06-18 15:18:57]
Very pretty article, although highly misleading. The only problem is that they studied effects on the Antarctic Peninsula, the only place in Antarctica that has warmed since the winds rotated, as Prof. Marcel Leroux has been demonstrating for years, and started to blow from the northwest, bringing warmer temperatures to the Peninsula. The change in wind patterns has nothing to do with Global Warming but with the Quasi Biennial Oscillation of stratospheric winds, the same oscillation that is related to the shrinking or enlarging of the ozone hole.

Larsen-B barrier didnᅡメt melt. It merely collapsed (as did several time before in Earthᅡメs history) by the excess weight provided by the advancing glaciers feeding the ice barrier. No rocket science here. Simple physics and structural engineering.

So the article is misleading. They didnᅡメt study warming in Antarctica; only in the Peninsula, that is undergoing an effect with no relation to Global Warming.

Eduardo Ferreyra
President
Argentinean Foundation for a Scientific Ecologya



one of the world's cruelest climates
by Jules Levin

[Comment posted 2007-06-17 05:51:53]
Well, if it is warming, maybe it will be less cruel.
Re rising ocean levels, doesn't ice displace more water than water? So that if all the floating ice melted the water level would go down, not up?
I would be less sceptical of global warming if SOMEONE once in a while would admit that somewhere, some part of the earth will actually benefit from warmer temperatures. Are we supposed to believe that we have been enjoying just the ideal temperature all over the world (never mind that North American civilization seems to thrive in both Miami and Winnipeg), and that any change will doom the planet?



More research is needed
by Kelly

[Comment posted 2007-06-15 18:59:01]
Hear, hear, Stephen, for bringing up a very valid concern. Looking at one location in a tight focus for a year shows trends...for that location. Trends around the world are different, this glacier is receding while that one advances, this species is becoming extinct while this other one is evolving or a hundred new ones are discovered...you will always find what you are looking for. That is true everywhere, especially in scientific realms where researchers are tightly focused and sometimes discard data which might conflict with their hypothesis.

Read more, learn more, watch more and THINK more. The climate is changing, as it has done for millennia and will continue to do so long after humanity has crumbled to dust. Knee-jerk reactions are dangerous in science, especially when bits and pieces of certain data is being tweaked to effect global policy and national economies. Be careful, be humble, and be afraid of anyone who tells you "the science is settled."



Fifteen months in an ice box
by Stephen Dunstan

[Comment posted 2007-06-15 17:09:24]
With the emphasis on Global Warming, is it really warming? According to some articles I have read, the temperature is actually cooler in a lot places than in previous years. Also, They stopped recording the temperatures in Siberia for inclusion into the studies.
Although the icebergs are melting and there isn't any quick response for the refreezing, the moisture in the atmosphere isn't there. Since the oceans are not rising, and the icebergs are not forming as quickly, where is the access moisture going?
Could the access moisture that should be showing up someplace be absorbed by the plants and trees to keep them surviving and green?
it seems that with the push on people knowing about "Global Warming" it is most likely because the research people need money for their budgets.



The News


Front Cover

Register for FREE Online Access

  • »Current issue
  • »Best Places to Work and Salary surveys
  • »Daily news and monthly contents emails

Register »

Subscribe to the Magazine

  • »Monthly print issues
  • »Unlimited online access
  • »Special offers on books, apparel, and more

Subscribe »

Library Subscriptions
Recommend to a Librarian

Masthead | Contact | Advertise | Privacy Policy
© 1986-2012 The Scientist