Bookmark and Share

Anti-malaria genes give mosquitoes an edge

Transgenic mosquitoes resistant to malaria infection outcompete normal mosquitoes when feeding on infected blood


[Published 20th March 2007 02:37 PM GMT]


Researchers are one step closer to creating a viable malaria-resistant mosquito, according to a study in this week's Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The authors found that, when feeding on malaria-infected blood, transgenic mosquitoes resistant to malaria infection experienced both higher fecundity and lower mortality than normal mosquitoes.

If such a mosquito could be introduced into the wild, "you may end up with populations that are refractory to the transmission of the parasite," predicted Peter Atkinson of the University of California, Riverside, who was not involved in the study.

Previous work has shown that mosquitoes infected with the malaria parasite are less fit than uninfected mosquitoes. This observation led to the hypothesis that transgenic malaria-resistant mosquitoes may outcompete wild-type mosquitoes, said study senior author Marcelo Jacobs-Lorena of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. However, other studies have shown that transgenic mosquitoes may suffer a loss in fitness that balances out any gains from malaria resistance. "It was believed that just the presence of the transgene is a detriment," Jacobs-Lorena said.

Led by Mauro T. Marrelli, also of Johns Hopkins, the researchers compared the fitness of wild-type Anopheles stephensi to that of mosquitoes expressing a peptide called SM1, which prevents the malaria parasite from invading the midgut. These transgenic mosquitoes cannot become infected with Plasmodium berghei, a malaria parasite that infects mice.

The researchers placed equal numbers of wild-type and transgenic mosquitoes in a cage and fed them Plasmodium infected mouse blood. After nine generations, transgenic mosquitoes made up about 70% of the population. Additional experiments showed that transgenic mosquitoes had both higher fecundity and lower mortality than wild-type mosquitoes when fed blood containing reproducing parasites.

"It's very nice work," Atkinson said. "Some people have always said that if we make these things transgenic, they'll just be so unfit because they're genetically altered that they'll never be of any use, [so] it's actually very encouraging news."

Previous studies have shown that a different type of malaria-resistant mosquito cannot outcompete wild-type mosquitoes. However, those transgenic mosquitoes fought the malaria parasite by upregulating the immune response, which "may impose costs on the mosquito that equal, or even outweigh, the benefits of not being infected," according to Hilary Hurd of Keele University in Staffordshire, UK, who was an author on these previous studies but was not involved in the current work. "The advantage of the SM1 peptide is that it is not part of the natural immune system and appears to inhibit infection by blocking parasite invasion rather than killing the parasite," Hurd told The Scientist in an Email.

In order to have a viable system that could be introduced into the wild, scientists will still need to come up with a genetic drive mechanism to encourage the transgene to spread among mosquito populations, Jacobs-Lorena said. Even though transgenic mosquitoes outcompete wild-types in the lab, this is probably not sufficient "to promote introduction of the gene into the wild by itself," he said. But their results suggest that "we may need not as strong a drive force as originally predicted in order to accomplish this goal."

Another important step is to replicate the findings using human malaria parasites in their natural mosquito vectors, according to Robert Sinden of Imperial College London, who was not involved in the study. "If the results are repeated under these conditions we will have reason to be optimistic for the future."

Melissa Lee Phillips
mail@the-scientist.com

Links within this article

L. Pray, "Scientists want to create a new kind of mosquito," The Scientist, November 25, 2002.
http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/13396/


M. Marrelli et al., "Transgenic malaria-resistant mosquitoes have a fitness advantage when feeding on Plasmodium-infected blood," PNAS, March 27, 2007.
'http://www.pnas.org


H. Black, "Scientists refining methods for genetically altering insects," The Scientist, October 13, 1997.
http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/17744/

M. Goozner, "Beating malaria," The Scientist, December 1, 2006.
http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/36878/

Peter Atkinson
http://www.facultydirectory.ucr.edu/cgi-bin/pub/public_individual.pl?faculty=86

H. Hurd, "Manipulation of medically important insect vectors by their parasites," Annual Review of Entomology, 2003.
'http://www.the-scientist.com/pubmed/12414739

Marcelo Jacobs-Lorena
http://faculty.jhsph.edu/Default.cfm?faculty_id=659

F. Catteruccia et al., "Impact of genetic manipulation on the fitness of Anopheles stephensiaa mosquitoes," Science, February 21, 2003.
http://www.the-scientist.com/pubmed/12595691

J. Ito et al., "Transgenic anopheline mosquitoes impaired in transmission of a malaria parasite," Nature, May 23, 2002.
http://www.the-scientist.com/pubmed/12024215

A.M. Ahmed, H. Hurd, "Immune stimulation and malaria infection impose reproductive costs in Anopheles gambiae via follicular apoptosis," Microbes and Infectiona, February 2006.
http://www.the-scientist.com/pubmed/16213176

Hilary Hurd
http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/aep/staff/hh.htm

Robert Sinden
http://www.bio.ic.ac.uk/research/res/sinden.htm





Advertisement

 

Rate this article

Rating: 2.00/5 (3 votes )





outcompete
by Krischan Makowka

[Comment posted 2007-03-22 01:40:18]
If I understood the article correctly, than they believe the malaria resistant moskitos are outcompeteing the Wildtype ones precicly because they are immune. It seems like the plasmodium state that lives in the moskitos also damages them a bit like it does in humans.
Thus if they would loose the immunity they wouldn't be able to outcompete the Wildtype ones any longer. And that is precisely the beauty of such a solution... with luck it could even trigger a natural selection "war" between the moskitos and the plasmodium!

There must be of course more studys because a lab enviroment isn't really comparable, but I think this should be tried in a field experiment as soon as possible. Especially if the wildtype population is decimated before releasing the geneticly modified ones it should proove to be quite efficient in fighting malaria!

And with a deathtoll of servaral million humans a year this really shouldn't be tested for another decade or so just because it *might* be somehow dangerous.
I for one am more than willing to take that risk, and the people actually affected by malaria will surely agree.



That was meant to be "Prometheus" (spelling error)
by Mary Shelly

[Comment posted 2007-03-21 21:57:56]
Sorry for the mistake it was inadvertant.

ᅡモI get up in the morning, torture a typewriter until it screams, then stop.ᅡヤ -Clarence B. Kelland



Post-Modern Promethus
by Mary Shelley

[Comment posted 2007-03-21 21:47:19]
Lets see whether I got this right.

In order to help defeat malaria a new transgenic species of mosquito is created. One that outlives and out reproduces the species that is the carrier (vector of transmission) of the disease.

The plan is that it will outcompete the problematic natural mosquito species.

Lets first contemplate the possibility that it does indeed fulfill its purpose and displaces the niche formerly held by the "natural" species. Does one really want a "better" mosquito that lives longer and has a higher fecundity level?

Lets contemplate an alternative, namely, it does not replace the targeted species but nature finds a means for them to interbreed. The result: a new mosquito that carries malaria, has a longer lifespan, and higher fecundity level than the original.

How fast do you think it would spread? Would it beat the (approx) 300 miles a year average rate the so-called Africanized honeybee (A.m. scutellata hybridized with European breeds see a.m.adamsonii) achieved in spreading from Brazil to the United States?


""Man," I cried, "how ignorant art thou in thy pride of wisdom!"" - Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley



Concern about the epidemiology and evolutionary
by Nongnuch

[Comment posted 2007-03-21 17:00:13]
Let say if you successes to produce the transgenic mosquito and release them in natural. How do you know the population of this mosquito can propagate and survive in natural? Because of the condition in laboratory is not exactly same in natural.

Especially Anopheles species in different geographic, they have different life behavior to feed and propagate offspring. And the cross mate in between complex species could be effect target gene express, can it? Parasite develop in the environmental condition under which the experiment such as the temperature to produce P. berghei sporozoite in laboratory lower than the natural be affect the expression of immune gene in the An. gambiae. Impact of malaria epidemiology such as ᅡモUsing Plasmodium resistant mosquitoes, tools that affect malaria transmission , must kept in mind that laboratory models might be limited in terms of advancing the understanding the understanding of relationship between Plasmodium and its vectors. How does malaria epidemiology affect the selection of mosquito resistant?

The human malaria as Plasmodium falciparum or P. vivax the parasite can infected well in many species of Anopheles mosquito in different areas.

To success deployment cutoff Malaria life cycle need to understand the all mechanism, involving how to impair malaria transmission, ecological, and evolutionary insights.




Anti-malaria genes give mosquitoes an edge
by Dr GR Rajasekariah

[Comment posted 2007-03-21 03:57:55]
Manipulation of mosquitoe genes to make resilient to malaria infection is very interesting but requires some thinking about its utility under field conditions. Moreover, we have read many such manipulations under the broad heading of "biological control". I wonder how many of such novel and laboratory conceived ideas have been successfully applied to field conditions? How far this research is going to be practically useful? Billions of dollars have been spent to control mosquitoes and good old "DDT" is back into action. Yet mosquitoes are resilient for control and they are still propagated without any impedence. No doubt vectors play very important role in dissemination of infection. This work, in my opinion should change its direction. They should consider the possibility of making the mosquitoes sterile by gene manipulation. If such approach can be achieved, then one can envisage the mosquitoe population undergoing sterility and thereby a direct hit on vector dissemination. This may have a broader applications and can be applied to many other vector-borne infections. Best of luck in their research.



Re: Problem?
by Geoff Smith

[Comment posted 2007-03-20 20:53:36]
Nate,
The Plasmodium requires the infection of the mosquito host to complete its life cycle. The gametocytes, which infect the mosquito, are not infective to humans from the mosquito. The gametocytes must undergo sexual reproduction in the mosquito's stomach and the resulting zygote must infect the midgut wall to develop into an oocyst. This oocyst then ruptures and releases sporozoites that in turn infect the salivary glands, which is the mode of transmission to humans. I would also suggest checking out the CDC website regarding malaria if you have any additional questions.



Problem?
by Nate Franley

[Comment posted 2007-03-20 18:10:53]
I'm an undergraduate pre-med major, and I don't know if I'm taking this article the right way. Making mosquitos resistant to malaria doesn't mean that they can't pass the malaria infection on to humans. I don't understand the positive implications of this research. Doesn't it just prolong the life of mosquitos (which is only 2 weeks anyway)?

Thanks.



The News


Front Cover

Register for FREE Online Access

  • »Current issue
  • »Best Places to Work and Salary surveys
  • »Daily news and monthly contents emails

Register »

Subscribe to the Magazine

  • »Monthly print issues
  • »Unlimited online access
  • »Special offers on books, apparel, and more

Subscribe »

Library Subscriptions
Recommend to a Librarian

Masthead | Contact | Advertise | Privacy Policy
© 1986-2012 The Scientist