Generating robustness

Email: Jonathan Weitzman - jonathanweitzman@hotmail.com
News from The Scientist 2003, 4(1):20030102-02     doi:10.1186/20030102-02

Published 2 January 2003

Gene knockouts often fail to reveal phenotypes, suggesting that biological systems are laden with compensation mechanisms, which might involve functional redundancy between duplicated genes or between alternative pathways and networks. In the January 2 Nature, Zhenglong Gu and colleagues describe a genome-wide evaluation of genetic robustness against null mutation (Nature, 421:63-66, January 2, 2003).

Analysis of fitness measurements for nearly all single-gene deletion mutants in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, showed that duplicate genes were less often associated with lethal phenotypes, and that deletion of duplicate genes had similar fitness effects. Gu et al. found evidence for a correlation between the sequence similarity of the duplicates and the frequency of compensation.

In addition, deleting the gene copy that is most highly expressed had the greatest effect on fitness. Functional compensation between duplicate genes may account for a quarter of gene deletions without phenotypes.



References

1.  [http://www.nature.com]
  Z. Gu et al., "Role of duplicate genes in genetic robustness against null mutations," Nature 2003, 421:63-66, January 2, 2003.
Return to citation in text: [1]
 
2. L.M. Steinmetz et al., "Systematic screen for human disease genes in yeast," Nature Genetics, 31:400-404, August 2002.

  Return to citation in text: [1]
 


Advertisement


 

Rate this article
  • Not currently rated. Be the first!
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Not currently rated. Be the first!








Front Cover

Register for FREE Online Access

  • »Current issue
  • »Best Places to Work and Salary surveys
  • »Daily news and monthly contents emails

Register »

Subscribe to the Magazine

  • »Monthly print issues
  • »Unlimited online access
  • »Special offers on books, apparel, and more

Subscribe »

Library Subscriptions
Recommend to a Librarian

Masthead | Contact | Advertise | Privacy Policy
© 1986-2012 The Scientist