|
The Scientist: NewsBlog:
A cancer vaccine -- that works?
[Entry posted at 25th November 2009 07:00 PM GMT]
| A new type of cancer vaccine tested in mice appears to overcome some of the major hurdles associated with the treatment approach, according to a paper published today (November 25) in Science Translational Medicine.
The technology, which the researchers have already licensed to a biotechnology company, is being developed for clinical trials of melanoma.
 | Immune cells are attracted by chemicals released by the polymer matrix (shown here) to sample the tumor molecules embedded within. Image: Edward Doherty, Omar Ali and MicroVision Labs Inc. |
The "reliable and careful" experiments shed light on a "promising approach" for a vaccine-based treatment for cancer, said Eli Gilboa a cancer immunologist from the University of Miami, who was not involved in the work. "It's a simple paper," he said, "in a good way."
The new technology consists of a small sponge, the diameter of a pencil eraser, embedded with a vaccine and inserted under the skin of mice with melanoma. The researchers saw an activation of the immune cells that attack tumors, as well as a suppression of regulatory T cells (Tregs), often recruited by the cancer to suppress the immune reaction. "In this particular model," Gilboa said, "the [immune response] is unprecedented."
Trying to force the immune system to fight cancer has been a tantalizing, though frustrating project for immunologists. Although the immune system can fight the very early stages of cancer (described in this month's issue), it is not generally effective at fighting the advanced stages of cancer. Larger tumors, which have accrued multiple mutations, can escape immune detection in various ways, and also suppress the immune reaction.
In this study, David Mooney at Harvard and his colleagues coated a polymer sponge with three vaccine components, including a puree made from their mouse model's melanoma cells and a cytokine known to attract two types of dendritic cells to the area. Dendritic cells direct the immune reaction by presenting cancer peptides to immune cells, priming them against the cancer. But dendritic cells can also trigger immune suppression, so the researchers embedded small lengths of nucleic acid that mimic bacterial DNA throughout the polymer matrix. With the bacteria-like nucleotides "you make the immune cells think they have a bacterial infection," which creates a robust immune responses involving many immune cell types, Mooney said. The strength of the reaction is likely to prevent immune suppression.
"I think the reason people are excited" about the research, said Mooney, "is that it has all of the molecular and cellular signatures of a strong vaccine reaction."
The approach would necessitate biopsies from each individual cancer patient to coat the polymer matrix, requiring a personalized approach. Mooney said he plans to try the approach using tumor antigens that are common to multiple tumors to see if they can develop a more generic vaccine.
Mooney will also explore some of the basic biology behind the process. "The results are very dramatic," said Mooney, but "mechanistically we don't understand a lot of what's happening" inside the polymer. The technology is already being developed for human clinical trials of melanoma by a company called InCytu. In the meantime, Mooney plans to explore the technology for other cancer types as well as looking into whether this approach might improve vaccines for infectious diseases.
Related stories:Immune system vs. Cancer [November 2009]A complement for cancer? [29 September 2008]The ecology of tumors [April 2006]
|
Rate this article
Rating: 3.97/5 (32 votes )
Great - now read about adult stem cells and umbilical cord stem cells in HUMANS by anonymous poster
[Comment posted 2009-12-01 20:44:14]
Neat work ...
Now what is the PRAGMATIC thing to do for people that is believable?
... astemcellpatentagent
The Key Is To Re-Activate T Effecter Cell Specifically by Hongrong Cai, MD
[Comment posted 2009-11-30 09:11:24]
Due to lack of tumor specific antigen it's difficult to reactivate T effecter cell (such as ctotoxic T lymphocyte, CTL) to attack tumor specifically. This apparatus ("vaccine") can certainly raise the non-specific immune response level because of the bacterial antigen used, resulting in certain degree of attack, I assume this apparatus ("vaccine") will also stimulate similar extent of attacking to other tumor because stimulation of non-specific immune response.
Better late than ever. Best ASAP with all validations upfront by Rafaela Canete-Soler
[Comment posted 2009-11-28 02:59:55]
Too much in a rush ??
Dear author,
There is something awkward in the article:
**The results are very dramatic, but mechanistically we don't understand a lot of what's happening inside the polymer**.
**The technology is already being developed for human clinical trials of melanoma by a company called InCytu**.
I understand the urgency of developing therapies for cancer but the above reading suggests that the rush could lead to undesirable results. First, human subjects exposed to a technology which ?we don?t understand a lot of what?s happening?. Second, the cost of a clinical trial potentially producing unpredictable events.
As suggested by the article itself and previous post, there are many unknowns about life threatening diseases (cancer) as well as some rare diseases (i.e. paraneoplastic syndromes).
I think that rather than advertising promises, we could encourage technology inventors and the company developing it to double their efforts in
a) testing and validating short and long-term effects of the therapeutic strategy in different models.
b) Present the outcome to independent experts for public discussion
c) Organize clinical trials.
I know that it sounds too long of a process but when it comes to matters of public health: Better late than ever. And the best would be, as soon as possible with all validations upfront ( For the sake of people, for the sake of economy).
Thank you
Cancer vaccine by anonymous poster
[Comment posted 2009-11-26 12:55:38]
No expert on the subject. Just wonder if the technology would have any potential or risk for creating situations like those presented by patients with neurologic paraneoplastic syndromes. Would that be an extreme remote possibility?. Would any expert comment on the potential risk.
Induction of autoimmune responses? by anonymous poster
[Comment posted 2009-11-26 11:04:20]
This is an interesting approach, but the melanoma 'puree' would contain mostly normal proteins in addition to a few cancer-specific proteins. Given the strong immune response elicited by the dendritic cells and the addition of bacterial DNA, isn't there a danger of inducing autoimmunity?
Simplicity is beauty by anonymous poster
[Comment posted 2009-11-26 06:26:47]
Excellent and imaginative work. I hope you've got it right, we're not getting any younger out here.
Comment on this blog
|