|
The Scientist: NewsBlog:
A fix for Down syndrome brains?
Posted by Victoria Stern [Entry posted at 18th November 2009 08:03 PM GMT]
Rate this article
Carried away by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2009-12-15 08:55:24] You guys are getting carried away here with reactions to the work. If someone has a heart condition and can't function, it is totally acceptable for them to recieve treatment. In this case, no matter how wonderful they are, people with Down's have a brain condition and can't function in certain ways. So, finding a treatment that helps them function is beyond any idea of political correctness or judgement. If it anything, it give them and us more time and freedom to enjoy their uniqueness. Re:Bioethical by Adam Smith [Comment posted 2009-11-23 15:42:25] "Scientifically, anything mentally significantly less than the norm is a deficit, pure and simple."
What an absurd comment. 'Scientifically' based on what? And who are you to say what is a strength and what is a weakness? Just because you believe that the strengths are minor doesn't necessarily make it so. What is scientifically true that is those with Trisomy 13 are different. The are not "mentally significantly less" because that would require a mental normal, itself an absurd concept. This is not "overzealous political correctness", this is respecting people for who they are and valuing differences, not try to make everyone the same. Just because you feel that these people are less than you, that they are "defects", please don't try to hide your prejudices in scientific terminology, your perverting the process. Bioethical "Correctness" by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2009-11-20 18:11:09] I personally find Tom Koch's comment disturbing. Scientifically, anything mentally significantly less than the norm is a deficit, pure and simple. To say it isn't by calling it something else or to magnify extremely minor "strengths" could detrimentally weaken the funding of treatments and scientific understanding of the processes.
Overzealous political correctness has stifled open dialogue to the point that basic problems cannot be addressed. I would hate to see bioethical correctness stifle science and medicine. Great News by ROY O MAHONY [Comment posted 2009-11-19 13:17:21] I would welcome this type of research, I would do anything that made sense to help my daughter (2) have a happy and fulfilling life
Rot Down syndrome by TOM KOCH [Comment posted 2009-11-19 08:45:19] Victor Stern's 18 Nov. posting on "A Fix for Down Syndrome Brains" is disturbing. In it he refers persistently to a "disorder" with "deficits" that should be corrected.
The Canadian Down syndrome Society defines Trisomy 21 as a naturally occurring genetic presence within the human community. Its members are, or can be, valuable contributors to their families and the community at large. The "deficits" are balanced by unusual strengths. In recent years we have learned that Trisomy 21 is cardio-protective, virtually illiminating conditions leading to heart attacks. The profile also is largely protective against breast cancer in women with Down syndrome. More importantly, however, persons with Down syndrome have strong emotional attributes and, typically, a perceptive intelligence that while it does not rank high on Stanford Binet scores is, we believe, is a real and important asset. This is not to argue against research like that Stern describes but it is to caution against easy and reflexive prejudices about a condition that is far more than a genetic profile. With the work Stern describes we equally need work to diminish prejudicial profiles of differences and promote social programs that maximize the potential of us all. Tom Koch, PhD bioethicist, Canadian Down syndrome Society (Resource Council). Comment on this blog |