|
The Scientist: NewsBlog:
Telomere researchers win Nobel
Posted by Katherine Bagley [Entry posted at 5th October 2009 03:52 PM GMT]
Rate this article
Addendum by Rafaela Canete-Soler [Comment posted 2009-10-07 06:23:07] A story of exploration and translation with **more than 32 millions* for THREE investigators initiating their research in 1978. In Spanish we say: "Los n?meros cantan". (Numbers speak) This is also a story of OUTSTANDING use of public resources. A story of exploration and translation by Rafaela Canete-Soler [Comment posted 2009-10-07 06:13:03] Theirs could have been a fairy tale. Fairy tales are entertaining and exciting. Momentarily. Because they take us to an ?imaginative? world but then there is the real world with lights and shadows. Theirs, instead, have been a story of science. A question, an idea to explore and, in the process of exploring, they found answers that extend to areas beyond their original question, placing their story in the horizon of commonalities in mechanisms of disease. I read the announcement of their Prize at the NIH news release (see below**) and I was very pleased: ** Dr. Blackburn has received NIH funding since 1978, Dr. Greider since 1990, and Dr. Szostak since 1980. The NIH has provided a total of more than $32 million to the three researchers for their study of telomeres, telomerase, and the molecular functions of cells.** I feel extremely happy for them and for science but again questioning myself about management of resources. How many more investigator-initiated grant proposals could have been funded and how many more could be funded in the future with an optimal management of public resources ???. Just a thought and a call for responsibility to government authorities. Corrected by Katherine Bagley [Comment posted 2009-10-06 14:02:43] Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We apologize for the mix up. Congratulations to Elizabeth Blackburn, Carol Greider, and Jack Szostak by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2009-10-06 13:16:38] Congratulations to Elizabeth Blackburn, Carol Greider, and Jack Szostak!
It would be good if the "TheScientist.com" authors and editors pay attention to proper English usage, and in particular, the difference between "principle" and "principal". Principal (adjective) means "primary" - as in "the principal of a school" or "the principal aim of a study" or "the principal papers of Blackburn". Principle (noun) refers to a rule, law or general truth, as in "the principles of mathematics" congratulations for a prize well deserved! by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2009-10-05 14:09:24] Wonderful news! Congratulations to all three, who deserve it well.
The telomere story is a superb example of how basic, "curiosity-driven" research (the kind whose outcomes cannot be predicted in advance, whose trajectory and pace of discovery can't be predicted in advance, the kind whose biomedical significance can't be predicted in advance, the kind that might well be deplored or ridiculed by those who don't really understand how science works) can lead to new information and understanding that radically changes the way we think about biological systems AND -- in the same breath -- opens up a fertile new field for translational and applied research. This prize is well earned and well deserved. And there is another reason for the scientific community to joyously applaud this particular Nobel Prize. As some of you might recall, "Blackburn was appointed a member of the President's Council on Bioethics in 2001. Her Council terms were terminated by White House directive on February 27, 2004... This was followed by expressions of outrage over her removal by many scientists." (quoted from Wikipedia). The immediate issue was stem cell research; the greater concern of the "many scientists" who expressed their outrage was the politicization of science in those years. This is a sweet victory for science and rational thought. May it be long lasting. Comment on this blog |