The Scientist : NewsBlog Print: Brain proteins make fears last
The Scientist: NewsBlog:
Brain proteins make fears last
Posted by Jef Akst
[Entry posted at 3rd September 2009 07:00 PM GMT]

Why are fearful memories so hard to shake? The answer may lie in developmental changes in the extracellular environment in the amygdala -- the emotional center of the brain -- where such memories are formed, according to a study published this week in Science.

Image: Wikimedia commons
"This is an extremely important observation because it suggests a mechanism for why fear memories are so indelible," neuroscientist Gregory Quirk of the University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine, who was not involved in the work, wrote in an email to The Scientist.

Memories of traumatic events can evoke excessive fear in inappropriate situations, in some cases leading to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). One treatment for PTSD involves re-exposing individuals to elements of the bad event without the associated emotional trauma, in order to decrease the fear stirred up by the memory. In adults, this process, known as extinction, involves learning a new association -- between the event and safety -- as opposed to unlearning the original memory. Because the original association remains, however, the fear can resurface unexpectedly later in life.

Unlike adults, young animals have no resistance to forgetting. In rats less than three weeks old, studies show, fear does not reappear after extinction training. Neuroscientist Andreas Lüthi of the Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research in Switzerland and his colleagues set out to figure out why. They stained the amygdala of young mice with a fluorescent dye and identified a distinct structural change during the first few weeks of development that corresponded with the animals' abilities to unlearn fearful memories.

That difference was a marked increase in the number of perineuronal nets (PNNs) in the extracellular matrix on which cells live. These nets are highly organized systems of proteoglycans that surround the neurons, and are known to play a role in neuronal plasticity in the visual system. When the researchers injected an enzyme to degrade these nets before exposing the mice to a fearful experience, adults reverted to a juvenile-like state in which they were later able to forget the fear.

"This is a beautiful proof of principle that the adult brain is not fixed but you can reverse engineer it to a [juvenile-like] state," said neuroscientist Takao Hensch of Harvard University, who did not participate in the research. This discovery may eventually be relevant to the success of therapies for anxiety disorders, he added.

Quirk pointed out that incorporating these findings into a clinical setting may not be easy, however. Forgetting the fear took more than time; the animals still needed extinction training to get rid of the fear response, and dissolving the PNNs after the fear had been learned did not boost the effectiveness of the extinction training. This suggests that the PNNs act during fear memory formation, not forgetting, and thus may limit the clinical application of manipulating these neural nets, he said.

"A treatment based on this approach could not be given as an adjunct to extinction-based therapies," Quirk said. "Instead, the treatment would have to be given prior to the trauma, perhaps to individuals with a high likelihood of experiencing traumatic events."

Furthermore, the method used in this study was highly invasive, Hensch said. "We need to know better how these extracellular factors are regulated in the first place, so we could come up with some noninvasive behavioral therapy."

The next step, Lüthi said, is nailing down the mechanism by which the PNNs affect fear memory acquisition. The nets form specifically around a certain class of inhibitory neurons, suggesting that reorganization of inhibitory pathways may be involved. "[But] we don't really understand what synaptic connections [are involved and how] neurons change during normal extinction learning in adults," he said. "This will definitely require further experiments."


Related stories:
  • Manipulating memory
    [March 2009]
  • Picturing Fear
    [28th October 2002]
  • Fear: real and imagined
    [3rd April 2001]

  •  

    Rate this article

    Rating: 3.92/5 (13 votes )





    On Memory And Immunity
    by Dov Henis

    [Comment posted 2009-09-09 00:35:47]
    Shedding Light On Memory Mechanism
    LINK
    LINK

    A. "Brain proteins make fear last"
    LINK

    "Shedding Light On Memory Mechanism"
    LINK


    B. Two additional recent works locate, likewise, the sites in multicell organisms where memories are impressed:
    LINK
    LINK

    But the mechanism of memory impression and recall has not yet been brought to light.


    C. Several years ago I suggested in "Memory, Sentience and Consciousness", at LINK

    "Some of the challenging interesting things to learn and search about memory via and by neurons are if, like its parent function, immunity, it is founded only on structural tags or on/also the location of the tags in the brain, and or/also on intimate linkage between the tag and a neuron's dendron, which is a physical modification/adaptation of the OCM, the outer cell membrane, the oldest and most evolved organ of Earth's 2nd-stratum organism, the genome."

    D. The "memory tag" possibility is brought up also at
    LINK

    E. The probable and possible evolotionary tie between the immune and memory systems is so obviously a plain common-sense possibility that it must be indeed scientifically probable...again, as common-sense is the best scientific approach...

    Dov Henis
    (Comments From The 22nd Century)
    Updated Life's Manifest May 2009
    LINK
    LINK

    EVOLUTION Beyond Darwin 200
    LINK



    Not convincing
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2009-09-06 06:18:49]
    I'd be more impressed if the authors even understood the difference between "extinction" - the elicitation of relevant responses without reinforcement - and "counter-conditioning" - the elicitation of relevant responses with motivationally-valenced reinforcement (what they are really alluding to). Lacking a basic grasp of that and, apparently, that branch of science, on which most of their suppositions depend, leads to skepticism regarding their other speculations.



    Comment on this blog