|
The Scientist: NewsBlog:
iPS cells yield live mice
Posted by Jef Akst [Entry posted at 23rd July 2009 05:00 PM GMT]
Rate this article
The following comment was deleted by Nature by Shi Liu [Comment posted 2009-07-30 08:55:18] ? Can we calm down a little bit and see if the passage of some incorrectly programmed stem cells (iPSCs) may be a harmful thing to mice now and to humans in future? We now know that iPSCs are not "indistinguishable" from ESCs and many of Yamanaka's "safe" iPSCs showed tumor/cancer formation (see details at LINK ). Why the researchers have not systematically looked tumor formation on the IPSCs generated here in the Yamanaka way? Why the team wouldn't even reveal the details of the "abnormalities"? Is the higher than 97% death rate a real success or a great failure even in the reproductive cloning sense? This may demonstrate the real danger of iPSCs by Shi Liu [Comment posted 2009-07-28 12:55:36] Now even Yamanaka admitted that many of his iPSCs are actually what I called "incorrectly programmed stem cells" (see LINK ) and Cell Stem Cell even published some data to support my earlier conclusion that iPSCs are different from ESCs. So the passage of incorrectly programmed stem cells may just show the risk of iPSCs as biological weapons can become real. I have to agree with the earlier poster by Jeremy Wickins [Comment posted 2009-07-26 06:04:31] As has already been said, if the researchers are not giving all the relevant information about these abnormalities, then there should have been no coverage by the main scientific journals. This is information that needs to be published, and has no IP implications, or any other downsides. I hope "The Scientist" will chase this up and encourage the researchers to be honest about this. and again by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2009-07-24 15:10:30] Exactly, what abnormalities? Do they have a large head? Do they look old when they are young? Do they have age-related diseases at a young age? Bad form by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2009-07-24 10:53:15] "The researchers said they have some abnormalities (not described in the paper), but declined to specify what they were in the briefing."
THEN THE STORY SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN COVERED!!!!! Ethical implications by Steven S. Clark [Comment posted 2009-07-24 10:48:22] I recently wrote an essay on the ethical implications of iPS cell pluripotency. You can find it at the link below. I think many will find it helpful and thought provoking. Thanks.
LINK What abnormalities? by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2009-07-23 12:34:31] The researchers said they have some abnormalities (not described in the paper), but declined to specify what they were in the briefing.
Salami slices? Abortion implications by Michael Holloway [Comment posted 2009-07-23 12:16:03] Think of the implications for anti-abortion extremists of the sort that are killing and terrorizing abortion providers. Am I murdering a baby by scratching, or would a cloned human lack a soul and all human rights? Perhaps they could start shooting cloned humans when they run out of medical professionals. Comment on this blog |