The Scientist : NewsBlog Print: The science of storytelling
The Scientist: NewsBlog:
The science of storytelling
Posted by Elie Dolgin
[Entry posted at 18th June 2009 07:03 PM GMT]

Science is a story -- a story about ideas, but also a story about the remarkable people who devote their lives to unraveling the wonders of nature. Scientists themselves, however, rarely have a vessel to impart their personal wisdoms since the main outlet for scientific research -- peer-reviewed literature -- is typically devoid of narrative.

Not so last Friday (June 12) night at the World Science Festival in New York City. Two Nobel Laureates, two neurobiologists, and two writers poured their hearts out to a packed room of showgoers at an event called Matter: Stories of Atoms and Eves, which was sponsored by The Moth, a nonprofit group that hosts storytelling slams.

In keeping with The Moth's traditions, each story of the event had to be true, short, and told without notes. "It was quite the effort trying to get a 40 minute presentation into 10 minutes," Irene Pepperberg, who studies animal cognition at Brandeis University in Massachusetts, told The Scientist. Pepperberg recounted the unique difficulties and excitement of working with her research subject and "colleague," Alex the African Grey parrot. After Alex's death in 2007, "I realized I'd lost the most important being in my life for the last thirty years," she told the rapt audience at the Players Club, a 270-person theater housed in the wood-paneled former dining room of a mansion on Gramercy Park.

Fellow bird biologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University also related the loss of a loved one -- his estranged father, who lived in caves in upstate New York and at the northern tip of Manhattan for six years as an eccentric way to understand how humans invented modern civilization, language, and religion. Jarvis' father was killed as part of a gang initiation twenty years ago at the age of 44, and was the inspiration for the book The Caveman's Valentine by the novelist George Dawes Green, who founded The Moth in 1997.

At the time of his father's death, Jarvis was a first-year molecular neurobiology graduate student at Rockefeller University working feverishly to prove that he wasn't "a failure" like his dad, spending days on end in his own self-described cave -- the laboratory. Jarvis himself turned 44 a few months ago -- a personal milestone because "I never knew if I was going to make it," he said, holding back tears. "Maybe I am like my father to a certain degree where I have one foot on the grid and one foot off the grid."

"I can tell the story with a straight face to an individual such as yourself, but getting up there in public and telling a whole crowd I felt very different," Jarvis told The Scientist. "It was much more of a challenge than I expected."

"All this time, I didn't realize how much [my father's death] had affected me," he continued. "I had to think really hard about how his life has affected my science."

The evening's most notable biologist was British biochemist Paul Nurse, former chief executive of Cancer Research UK and now president of Rockefeller University in New York City. Nurse, recounted a gripping personal tale of hereditary discovery, which he described as "quite the Dickensian novel."

As a boy, Nurse always felt "a little bit different" from the rest of his family. His parents and siblings all left school at age 15 while he excelled at academics and pursued higher education. In his 30s, Nurse's mother confided in him that both she and Nurse's father were "illegitimate" -- born out of wedlock to unknown fathers. A shocking revelation, but it didn't really explain why he was the oddball in the family.

Glossing over his career, which included being knighted in 1999 and winning the 2001 Nobel Prize for discovering key cell cycle regulators, Nurse fast-forwarded to two years ago when he was rejected for a US Green Card. "I know Homeland Security has high standards," Nurse said, wryly, "but, I mean, this did seem more than a bit ridiculous." It turned out he had submitted a type of birth certificate that did not list his parents' names. He sent away for a more complete birth record, which arrived with the name of his "sister" in place of his mother's, and a blank where his father's should have been. Nurse learned at the age of 58 that he too was illegitimate.

"The final irony here really," he said, "is I'm not a bad geneticist, and my rather simple family kept my own genetic secret for over half a century."

The evening's host, Andy Borowitz, a comedian and the only non-scientifically trained storyteller on the panel, related his "brush with science" -- medical complications he suffered from a twisted colon. Science writer Paul Hoffman also spoke about his contentious and competitive relationship with his literature professor father, and Leon Lederman, the 86-year-old Fermi Lab particle physicist, closed the show, recounting a brief graduate school encounter with Albert Einstein. In less than a minute, Einstein dismissed Lederman's investigation into subatomic particles as a waste of time. (In 1988, Lederman won the Nobel Prize for discovering the muon neutrino.)

"It's not every night that we have two Nobel Laureates," Lea Thau, The Moth's executive and creative director, told The Scientist. "I was extremely moved by the evening. When you have someone who's contributed as much to the world as these people have, it adds a bit of gravitas, and we're all in awe. But the thing I love about story telling is that it levels the playing field."

Update: A video has been removed from this story.


Related stories:
  • Bird boogies for science
    [18th June 2009]
  • Watching wisdom
    [12th June 2009]
  • Science plays come of age
    [28th July 2006]

  •  

    Rate this article

    Rating: 4.49/5 (35 votes )





    A Tale of Science Between the Lines
    by Jeffrey Peyton

    [Comment posted 2009-06-22 10:37:38]
    Very nice, but this storytelling story has already been told in the pages of Scientific American MIND (August, 2008). Not that it should not be told again and again. This article is all about stories that drive scientists, as opposed to the brain physiology in response to, and in the course of storytelling. Both dimensions of storytelling are important. These days more scientists are telling their physiological stories to Educators?as in ?this is your brain on storytelling or music?. The primary users of such research and knowledge are children, parents, and educators. These days a teacher who feels creative and bold enough to bring music or storytelling into our Factory Farm classrooms must have a) a contact high b) a rare penchant for out-of?the-box teaching, or c) a strong belief in merit bonuses. The Neuroscience of Music is now a familiar note. And the next annual New York Celebration of Teaching Learning will milk Music for whatever it?s worth. Pretty soon, if we?re not careful, as has happened with the brain imaging craze, the human mind will be mapped right down to its response to Jello.

    In the race to enlighten our understanding of the brain, all roads appear to lead to the Emerald City where the World Science Festival takes place balanced on the very tip of a mountain in an elegant bubble of Green-glowing gas. Inside the bubble swims an all-knowing Sea Yertle who goes through the locomotions of motion hanging from invisible strings connected to the sky. This great Yertle of Science must surely believe that he rules the World of Science because one day I recently approached the great Yertle of the Science World to tell him about my work in the lowly art of puppet play, and he asked to see my puppet research. The Yertle of Science must have liked it a lot because he appeared so much to eat it. I wanted to know how my puppet story tasted. No matter how hard I knocked on his shell, he would not come out to talk to me.

    (My puppet work is a life opus of 35 years. An old turtle myself, my puppet work had been recognized by the OECD in 04 when I was invited by the OECD to present my application and theoretical papers on the subject of puppet play.)

    I know why the Great Turtle did not deign to speak with me: the notion that puppets have a scientific side is just too risky. Besides, they appear to be juvenile?for young children only. The irony! Here was the Great Yertle not emerging from his Great Shell to learn more about recent research that quantified the benefits of older high school students responding unconditionally to puppets in the hands of a teachers. I coaxed the Great Yertle of Science and told him that before the Yertles of Education would ever allow the arts to pass into the kingdom of learning, educators would first have to grasp the larger picture of Play as an Organizing Principle. I told him: The behavior of hand puppetry and children?s response to it offered Educators a tangible, visual, kinetic language by which to experience and behold this superconductive power themselves. Puppet Play is a species-specific communication behavior in human play. When you mix play with a primal, kinetic, and symbolic art form you get a brain-based teaching language. I told him that inherent in puppet play is a wavelength for reaching young minds unlike any other because it changes the nature of knowledge and transforms classrooms into buzzing habitats. The advent of Puppetry as a mass media teaching and learning language would behave like a visual form of Jazz, and would emulate an evolutionary big bang of dynamic, intelligent life forms in classrooms at all levels.

    But alas in Yertledom a discussion about puppets must require an HD Box-- for my words came out garbled. Getting art into the hands of teachers works only so far unless you recognize that the art itself possesses powers far beyond the subject or art itself?powers that can be used to transform the learning culture. In a factory farm learning culture, art will get lip service but not serious or sustained use. Art must be engineered and mainstreamed past the gates of a change-resistant learning culture. Merely teaching 'art and craftily' is no longer enough. If you want to change Education, you had better reach systemically with your tools into the culture.

    As literature teaches, slow-moving animals with shells on their back tend toward the reclusive, yet some are turned on by the race. In the race to find a solution to the Education Problem, I?m in for the long haul. I see Yertle off there in the distance. He may believe he rules the terrain. But he?s just stuck on a fence post, flapping his legs and arms. He has no chance of reaching the finish line--let alone winning.

    Jeffrey Peyton
    Inventor, Play Language



    great talks
    by Yu Yiming

    [Comment posted 2009-06-21 05:13:22]
    It is really nice to hear the personal stories of these great scientists. I really hope there are more these kind of events. We should share not only knowledge but also the emotions that driven us in scientific careers.



    So women are repositories for all smart genes!
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2009-06-19 14:33:20]
    Dr. Nurse story is indeed a testimony of women being the safe repositories of highly useful genes irrespective of male shares.



    So true!
    by Roselyn Cerutis

    [Comment posted 2009-06-19 14:20:58]
    This is a wonderful article. Thanks to Paul Stein for posting his comment on the much-suppressed right brain - that was so well stated!



    The Other Half of the Brain
    by PAUL STEIN

    [Comment posted 2009-06-19 11:29:06]
    We use the left side of our brains so much in our scientific endeavors. It usually dominates our non-working hours too, indeed even our dreams. However, there are those interesting, unique, and wondrous times when our right brain screams, "Get out of the way! I have something to say!"



    Comment on this blog