The Scientist : NewsBlog Print: Researcher razzle-dazzle
The Scientist: NewsBlog:
Researcher razzle-dazzle
Posted by Elie Dolgin
[Entry posted at 28th May 2009 09:47 PM GMT]

Biomedical researchers don't typically rub elbows with rock-'n-roll royalty in the pages of glossy magazines. In fact, they never do. Until now.

Seal, Eric Topol, and David Agus
Image: Geoffrey Beene / GQ
In the June issue of GQ, a popular men's fashion magazine, 11 of America's leading biomedical researchers appear alongside celebrated pop musicians for a multi-page spread called "Rock Stars of Science." The scientists traded in their elbow-patched tweed for snazzier, designer threads, for a photo shoot that the organizers of the project, a charitable men's clothing brand, hope will help heighten the public's awareness of these biologists and their work while showcasing the need for greater science funding.

"We need to get the best and brightest excited to go into science and medicine," David Agus, a University of Southern California cancer researcher, who was photographed alongside Scripps cardiologist Eric Topol and multi-platinum-selling singer Seal, told The Scientist. "This is an innovative way to bring attention to research."

"It's all very tongue and cheek but it gets people talking about what we can do to attract more grassroots support of science," said Samuel Gandy, an Alzheimer's researcher at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, who was photographed in a blue sateen shirt and a black bowtie.

Anthony Fauci, Sheryl Crow, and Harold Varmus
Image: Geoffrey Beene / GQ

The campaign is the brainchild of Meryl Comer, president of the Geoffrey Beene Gives Back Alzheimer's Initiative, a philanthropic wing of the Geoffrey Beene menswear label, which donates all its net profits to support medical and educational research and outreach. She said she was inspired after reading a March 2008 Harris Interactive survey, conducted on behalf of Chicago's Museum of Science and Industry, which found that only 4% of Americans could name a single living scientist. "I said, 'Well, let's celebrate scientists," Comer told The Scientist. "They're rock stars. They spend 20 years on one molecule in the hopes of modifying our lives." She personally recruited the scientists, including Nobel Prize winner Harold Varmus, Human Genome Project director Francis Collins, and NIAID director Anthony Fauci, among others. Her children and the GQ staff then helped her find the musicians, and she had her "dream team."

Rudy Tanzi, Joe Perry, and Francis Collins
Image: Geoffrey Beene / GQ
"I really enjoyed the electricity and energy that was in the air," said Rudy Tanzi, an Alzheimer's researcher at the Massachusetts General Hospital, who flew in from a meeting in the Czech Republic for the photo shoot. "I basically had no sleep. With the stubble on my face I looked like a rock star, so it worked out perfectly." Tanzi, a keyboard player himself and a self-described "Aerosmith fan since I've been a kid," had his picture snapped alongside Aerosmith lead guitarist Joe Perry. Though thrilled at meeting his childhood rock idol, Tanzi kept the glamour of the experience in perspective. "Science is a lot more intimidating," he said.

"What these scientists are doing to fight diseases like breast cancer is just as much driven by inspiration and a passion for humanity as the best song ever written," said Grammy Award-winning musician Sheryl Crow, in a press release. "Without our realizing it, they are quietly making everyone's life healthier and fuller, so we all owe them our deepest respect and support."

The photo shoot itself was "a really good time," said Dale Schenk, chief scientific officer and executive vice-president of Elan Corporation, a neuroscience-based biotech company headquartered in Dublin, Ireland. Schenk, who was photographed alongside UCLA's Jeffrey Cummings and pop singer Josh Groban, said his "only disappointment" was that he wasn't crazy about the clothes he was given. "I was the only scientist that ended up in tennis shoes and barefoot, but what can you do?"

Geoffrey Beene strictly sells men's clothing, so only male scientists were photographed for the campaign. But "next round I'd love to do women," said Comer. In the meantime, readers can nominate their own Rock Stars of Science on the associated website, which is scheduled to launch June 1 and will also include profiles, behind-the-sciences videos, prize give-aways, and petitions. The full GQ spread can be found here or on newsstands everywhere.


Related stories:
  • Rock-it science
    [6th March 2009]
  • Biology rocks
    [27th February 2009]
  • Communicating to the public
    [20th July 1998]

  •  

    Rate this article

    Rating: 3.30/5 (27 votes )





    "Gilt" by association
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2009-06-15 14:41:59]
    One of the messages here is that science is "cool," and tries to interest youngsters in the field. I wonder, though, if teenagers look at venues like GQ magazine.



    Dose of Reality Needed
    by Anita Allen

    [Comment posted 2009-05-30 10:50:06]

    So, The Scientist reports on GQ as news and coathangs for brand gladrags? Tongue-in-cheek and all, this was an unashamed endorsement for a specific approach to disease that has failed to cure anyone. It's not as if there isn't opposition argument, research and data. There's plenty - only don't look for it among GQ muzo endorsements, or in The Scientist which is now the same thing.

    After more than 20 years of Harold Varmus and Anthony Fauci at the helm of health we still have cancer and AIDS, while the list of emerging diseases rises exponentially - Alzheimer's being one, autism another, diabetes...

    How long will kudos continue to rain down on scientists who fail so miserably in the objective of relieving human suffering? Clearly, one of the reasons has to be because scientific reporting no longer has the power to reflect real scientific news, hence the resort to gimmicks.

    We really need to know from these scientists what they are going to do differently from the past 20 years since 1989 when at a fork in the Science Road, they took a road more travelled and since then have managed to ignore every warning sign it was a dead-end. Before anyone gives them any more money they should know that just for AIDS they have had $200bn courtesy of the US taxpayer - and no one cured yet.

    Meanwhile, those that took the road less travelled back in 1989, in defiance of the Nobel nod for oncogenes, don't you think it is long overdue that The Scientist investigate how it makes all the difference? - Anita Allen. anita@theallens.co.za




    In Your Face PETA!
    by PAUL STEIN

    [Comment posted 2009-05-29 13:12:36]
    'Nuf said.



    Comment on this blog