The Scientist : NewsBlog Print: Cancer research, stimulated
The Scientist: NewsBlog:
Cancer research, stimulated
Posted by Bob Grant
[Entry posted at 21st April 2009 04:42 PM GMT]

The US federal agency tasked with tackling cancer has laid out a plan to double the number of cancer research projects it funds, prioritizing first-time grants to young researchers and emphasizing genomic approaches to understanding the disease.

These goals are attainable, according to John Niederhuber, director of the National Cancer Institute (NCI), thanks to an infusion of government funding from an increased annual budget and recently awarded stimulus funds.

But since stimulus funds must be spent within two years, Niederhuber said during a speech at the American Association for Cancer Research conference in Denver, the NCI is weighing grant awards carefully.

"It falls to NCI to carefully calculate and thoughtfully assume the risks of initially funding some four-year grants with economic stimulus money, knowing that we will need to find additional resources for the out years," Niederhuber said, according to a transcript of his speech. "I believe it falls, as well, to our grantees to come forward with only their strongest science."

In 2009 the agency will be able to fund the top 16% of grant applications instead of only the top 12%--last year's payline--based on budgetary increases alone, Niederhuber said. The NCI may be able to fund 25% of applications with the added $1.3 billion that the agency is set to receive as part of the $10 billion in stimulus funding for the National Institutes of Health.

But raising the payline is only half the story. "Economic stimulus funds give us the chance to be visionary," Niederhuber said, adding that the NCI will seek to fund more young, first-time investigators, and will emphasize prevention and early diagnosis in the research it supports in the future. "Patients still need better treatments, better prevention, and better early detection," he said. "We must recommit ourselves to answering that call."

This recommitment comes in the form of three initiatives--genetic screening of different cancers, developing personalized cancer care drug development platforms, and integrating the work of physical scientists in oncological study--that largely target cancer's molecular roots.

Through programs such as the Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments (TARGET) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), the three year old project on which the NCI collaborates with the National Human Genome Research Institute, researchers hope to identify a slew of genes related to various tumor types, Niederhuber said. TCGA has already identified new genes involved with glioblastoma tumors and has characterized four different subtypes of the deadly cancer. "With that foundation of success, we plan to move TCGA forward, with a goal of identifying all of the relevant genomic alterations in 20 to 25 major tumor types."

"We are undoubtedly moving toward the day when cancers will be diagnosed early and controlled," Niederhuber said.


Related stories:
  • Your guide to NIH stimulus funds
    [2nd April 2009]
  • How to spend the NIH stimulus
    [11th February 2009]
  • Biomedical research is ripe for a stimulus
    [9th February 2009]

  •  

    Rate this article

    Rating: 4.25/5 (8 votes )





    And nothing will come from it.
    by C M

    [Comment posted 2009-04-23 07:40:29]
    As usual, any funds that aren't eaten up by expenses will go to the usual suspects that are already receiving money to waste everyone's time watching people die from cancer as they use the useless drugs from the pharmaceutical industry that wants a cure about as much as they want cancer to disappear, while the real potential treatments using new technologies and new discoveries that do not involve the major pharma companies will not be able to get funding.

    Sure, researchers that have been having great success in early stage discoveries can apply - and wait a couple of years and then be told to re-apply and then find out that they have finally succeeded and a grant for them has been approved...but unfortunately, all the money is gone and they can apply again should more money be forthcoming from the government or some other agency.



    It's only a drop in the bucket
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2009-04-21 14:18:00]
    Two-year funding for $10 billion to fund a bloated cancer research will make very little, if any, medical breakthrough. Also, much of it, like the past funds, will go to waste to support the bureacracy rather than real science.



    genes only?
    by Gerry Smith

    [Comment posted 2009-04-21 14:05:18]
    Not all talent is tied up with genes.



    Good News, But...
    by Hongrong Cai, MD

    [Comment posted 2009-04-21 13:31:38]
    Obviously it's a good news. But how can we help the researchers survive till this good news come out. Life has up and down cycles. How can we help the researchers when life is at down side so that they had not died out. Otherwise the money comes but the talent is gone. Those who are in the position to control the resource really should have the sense of responsibilty to let talent people play their creative role.



    Comment on this blog