|
The Scientist: NewsBlog:
Cancer research, stimulated
Posted by Bob Grant [Entry posted at 21st April 2009 04:42 PM GMT]
Rate this article
And nothing will come from it. by C M [Comment posted 2009-04-23 07:40:29] As usual, any funds that aren't eaten up by expenses will go to the usual suspects that are already receiving money to waste everyone's time watching people die from cancer as they use the useless drugs from the pharmaceutical industry that wants a cure about as much as they want cancer to disappear, while the real potential treatments using new technologies and new discoveries that do not involve the major pharma companies will not be able to get funding.
Sure, researchers that have been having great success in early stage discoveries can apply - and wait a couple of years and then be told to re-apply and then find out that they have finally succeeded and a grant for them has been approved...but unfortunately, all the money is gone and they can apply again should more money be forthcoming from the government or some other agency. It's only a drop in the bucket by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2009-04-21 14:18:00] Two-year funding for $10 billion to fund a bloated cancer research will make very little, if any, medical breakthrough. Also, much of it, like the past funds, will go to waste to support the bureacracy rather than real science. genes only? by Gerry Smith [Comment posted 2009-04-21 14:05:18] Not all talent is tied up with genes. Good News, But... by Hongrong Cai, MD [Comment posted 2009-04-21 13:31:38] Obviously it's a good news. But how can we help the researchers survive till this good news come out. Life has up and down cycles. How can we help the researchers when life is at down side so that they had not died out. Otherwise the money comes but the talent is gone. Those who are in the position to control the resource really should have the sense of responsibilty to let talent people play their creative role. Comment on this blog |