The Scientist : NewsBlog Print: Texas school hired while firing
The Scientist: NewsBlog:
Texas school hired while firing
Posted by Elie Dolgin
[Entry posted at 31st March 2009 03:53 PM GMT]

The University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston is bringing in new assistant professors at the same time as around 30 fired faculty members, many of them tenured, fight for the jobs they lost in the aftermath of Hurricane Ike.

After the Sept. 13 storm hit the island campus, UTMB declared financial exigency and conducted mass layoffs that ultimately cost around 2,500 jobs, including the posts of 127 faculty members, 83 of which were tenured or on a tenure-track. Around a quarter of these fired staff are now appealing those layoffs, some arguing that the medical branch used the disaster as an excuse to undermine the tenure process.

"Clearly the 'financial exigency' as narrowly defined did not drive the process of selecting programs and positions for termination, but instead, became a convenient excuse or explanation for what appears to be a general reduction in force that is not specifically related to Hurricane Ike or related financial shortfalls," Charles Holzer, a fired psychiatry professor who worked at UTMB for 24 years and is appealing his termination at a hearing today (Mar. 31), wrote in an statement posted on his website.

"You don't make long term changes in your staff unless you have some other agenda," Holzer told The Scientist.

At the same time as tenured faculty were given the pink slip, the medical branch brought on board more than 20 new hires, many on a tenure track, in the months after Ike, according to a document requested from UTMB on January 19th under the Texas Public Information Act by George Reamy of the Texas Faculty Association, an organization that represents Texas faculty members.

The Scientist contacted half a dozen of the newly appointed faculty on the document's list, all of whom said they were offered jobs either formally or verbally before the hurricane hit. But bringing in new people at the same time as quashing tenure contracts "suggests that the university has not acted consistent with its tenure promises," said Jeffrey Kramer, a trial lawyer specializing in employment law at the Los Angeles-based firm Troy and Gould, in an email.

"It does suggest that some priority is being removed from the concept of tenure by leapfrogging these people" who didn't join the faculty until after the hurricane, Joe Jaworksi, a Galveston attorney with an ongoing lawsuit challenging the mass layoffs, told The Scientist.

Under regulation 4c(6) of the American Association of University Professors' (AAUP) Recommended Institutional Regulations on Academic Freedom and Tenure, an institution shouldn't replace a professor who was terminated on the grounds of financial exigency within a period of three years, "unless the released faculty member has been offered reinstatement and a reasonable time in which to accept or decline it."

Replacing tenured faculty with more junior staff "filling the same roles and qualifications would certainly be a violation of many of our standards, and would be an attack on tenure," said Eric Combest, an associate secretary in the AAUP's department on academic freedom, tenure, and governance.

After the hurricane, Regino Perez-Polo, chair of UTMB's biochemistry and molecular biology department, fired five faculty members from his department, two of whom were tenured. These people were chosen, he told The Scientist, because they were either retiring or not bringing external grant money into the department.

Since December, his department has hired three new tenure track assistant professors, though he said that they are all funded from outside the department's coffers. The department is "not contributing a single cent to their compensation," he said.

At least one of these new hires, however, does not have any grant money to add to the department. Yong Sun Lee, who joined UTMB in January, said that he's funded with "nothing other than the [university's] start-up money." The other two new hires declined to comment.

Tian Wang, who joined UTMB in November with a dual appointment to the microbiology & immunology and pathology departments, brought with her two NIH grants and is "paid by both my NIH grants and the university," she said. But Thomas Green and Harold Pine, tenure track assistant professors who joined UTMB in January, said they have no external sources of funding and are being paid solely from their respective departments. (Green's pharmacology department laid off two non-tenure track professors after Ike, while Pine's otolaryngology department cut three positions, including one tenured and one tenure-track professor.)

"There's been some underhanded stuff," said Reamy. The UTMB officials "used Ike as the excuse for all kinds of things." He noted that the original Nov. 12 announcement of mass layoffs asserted that the UT System "does not have the resources available to cover the ongoing operating expenses and needs of UTMB." Yet, in the two months between the hurricane and the job cut announcement, the medical branch made 11 new faculty appointments.

At a "town hall" meeting on Thursday (Mar. 26), which is available as a webcast, UTMB president David Callender said, "We don't have any specific plans that I am aware of to recruit back any of those faculty who were involved in the [layoffs]. That's not to say that that couldn't happen." Callender and UTMB executive vice president and provost Garland Anderson did not respond to requests for interviews.

Under the UT Regents rules, the fired faculty members who are appealing their terminations must now prove either that financial exigency was not the true reason for cutting academic positions, or that the decision to eliminate their position instead of axing someone else was "arbitrary and unreasonable." Three-member panels of senior faculty are hearing the ongoing appeals. These panel members then have 30 working days to make a recommendation to Callender, who in turn has 30 working days to make a final decision.


Related stories:
  • Fired faculty speak out
    [4th December 2008]
  • Texas profs sue university
    [2nd December 2008]
  • Does tenure need to change?
    [September 2007]

  •  

    Rate this article

    Rating: 4.27/5 (30 votes )





    One of the worst places to work anyway!
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2009-04-14 22:28:23]
    UTMB is one of the worst places to work anyway. Therefore I suggest that all you guys that have been fired just take what ever money you can get and move. I was fired from this institute 3 years ago for refusing to fabricate data. When I complained, I was told not only by my supervisor but also the former chairman of the department that writing and submitting patents even using data that never existed (or existed only in imagination) was the norm and that EVERYONE was doing it. This was supposed to be for the purpose of getting grants from the NIH. I complained to the so called 'integrity officer' at UTMB and nothing was done about my complaints. I was finally fired for working with radioactivity in a non-designated area. It is noteworthy that such areas were never demarcated or explained to me and I was not provided ANY training in designated or non-designated areas for radioactive work at UTMB. I suspect that my supervisor had planted radioactive material and had dicovered it himself as he knew exactly where to look for it. So I warn the faculty undergoing the farce of faculty hearings that nothing will come out of this. Just sue the daylights out of UTMB, take your money and get out of that dingy and shady institution. It is not worth pursuing your career or expending your energy and intellect at UTMB.



    Tenure???
    by Timothy Ray

    [Comment posted 2009-04-14 22:17:03]
    wasn't that something Galileo was fighting? No doubt there was politics in this but has not the time come to end this practice?



    Misleading statements
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2009-04-03 05:12:14]
    The story contains several misleading statements. For example, Dr. Pine is a pediatric ENT surgeon; while the tenured and tenured track faculty RIFed in his department were basic scientists. The article implies all 3 have the same skill set. They do not.



    Welcome to Texas
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2009-04-01 16:35:42]
    This kind of behavior is a tradition in Texas. UTMB isn't the first to engage in chicanery against its faculty and it won't be the last. The social atmosphere and value system here is what makes people like Tom Delay and Phil Gramm possible.



    Institutions Sminstitutions?
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2009-04-01 13:15:23]
    This is nothing new, as a previous poster suggests. When I was a child I watched my father lose his job as a salesman for a major food supplier, a company that had long since been absorbed twice and finally by Kraft Foods, in the U.S.. At that time in history, the stigma of losing one?s job was much worse than it is today. Now, the idea seems to be to change careers, not necessarily jobs, every six years or so. In science this was not really the case since most of us are specialists and experts at what we do. I also find that when the ultimate nightmare occurs, that we lose our position, that we have a much more difficult time fending off those just coming out of college or grad school with the cutting edge techniques. In fact the older more experienced scientist that has a background in a specific area is more obsolete than useful (please! prove me wrong since I am now over 5 years unemployed from science). But what really seems to be occurring is that we must go where the jobs are. So pack-up and move; and by the way we, the company, can no longer afford the expense of the move or the cost of your reeducation to come up to the necessary level of skills we, the company, desire. And while you, the potential employee, are moving all over the U.S. (or the world for that matter) it becomes necessary to discard and lighten rather than build and improve your personal lifestyle and associated belongings. But don?t worry your work days will be much longer so you won?t need all that stuff anyway. Property ownership, you don?t need that either, since you?ll be moving all over the place just to survive. Sound familiar; what was it that Ross Peroe (I think that?s how it?s spelled) said? ?You?ll hear the sucking sound of jobs leaving the U.S.?? We?ve entered survival mode folks. This story is more of the same ugliness that?s all around. Great Depression II?



    Regents' Rule 31003, Sec. 3.6
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2009-04-01 00:49:14]
    Regents' Rule 31003, Sec. 3.6 states that "Any person terminated due to financial exigency will be notified when a vacancy occurs in the same institution in their field of teaching within the next two academic years following the termination. If such person makes timely application and is qualified for the position to be filled, they shall be offered employment in that position."

    That Sec. makes two important points: (1)the fired faculty should be informed that a vacancy occured; (2) the fired faculty does not need to have a funded grant to be rehired in the same position, but only to show that he/she is still "qualified" for that position. Therefore, UTMB departments that are hiring new faculty would have to first use Sec. 3.6 before a new faculty is actually hired (in the same position) in a given department. The letter Dean Anderson sent to fired faculty (dated November 24, 2008) is also very explicit on this point. Therefore, if a given chair wants to avoid a violation of Sec. 3.6. he or she would have to wait for at least two years after the termination of a given faculty to make a decision regarding the hiring of new faculty. It appears, however, that Sec. 3.6 has already being violated by several chairs at UTMB (according to the article dated March 31, 2009 in The Scientist).



    I've heard nothing good about UTMB...
    by Sergio Vasquez

    [Comment posted 2009-03-31 15:53:44]
    Apparently, there is also some infighting going on amongst faculty concerning the medical curriculum, at least anecdotally -- I have half a dozen peers who complain about the focus of the medical teaching faculty.

    The administration of UTMB better tighten up their standards and ethics because word of mouth is going to depress interest from top candidates, faculty and students alike.



    It's all a change in focus
    by Duane Couchot-Vore

    [Comment posted 2009-03-31 13:42:42]
    This is what we can expect given that our universities are becoming less and less institutions of higher learning and research and more and more simply businesses. How can we expect to engender any respect for education among the public when our leading institutions themselves so shoddily disrespect it?



    Avoiding Waste of Talents
    by Hongrong Cai, MD

    [Comment posted 2009-03-31 13:22:16]
    We really need a systemic maintainance for experts to stay in their positions to continue their creative activities.



    Unfortunately, this is not new.
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2009-03-31 11:43:26]
    I think you will find that similar actions took place at some Louisiana institutions (higher and secondary education) after Hurricane Katrina.



    Comment on this blog