|
The Scientist: NewsBlog:
Texas school hired while firing
Posted by Elie Dolgin [Entry posted at 31st March 2009 03:53 PM GMT]
Rate this article
One of the worst places to work anyway! by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2009-04-14 22:28:23] UTMB is one of the worst places to work anyway. Therefore I suggest that all you guys that have been fired just take what ever money you can get and move. I was fired from this institute 3 years ago for refusing to fabricate data. When I complained, I was told not only by my supervisor but also the former chairman of the department that writing and submitting patents even using data that never existed (or existed only in imagination) was the norm and that EVERYONE was doing it. This was supposed to be for the purpose of getting grants from the NIH. I complained to the so called 'integrity officer' at UTMB and nothing was done about my complaints. I was finally fired for working with radioactivity in a non-designated area. It is noteworthy that such areas were never demarcated or explained to me and I was not provided ANY training in designated or non-designated areas for radioactive work at UTMB. I suspect that my supervisor had planted radioactive material and had dicovered it himself as he knew exactly where to look for it. So I warn the faculty undergoing the farce of faculty hearings that nothing will come out of this. Just sue the daylights out of UTMB, take your money and get out of that dingy and shady institution. It is not worth pursuing your career or expending your energy and intellect at UTMB. Tenure??? by Timothy Ray [Comment posted 2009-04-14 22:17:03] wasn't that something Galileo was fighting? No doubt there was politics in this but has not the time come to end this practice? Misleading statements by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2009-04-03 05:12:14] The story contains several misleading statements. For example, Dr. Pine is a pediatric ENT surgeon; while the tenured and tenured track faculty RIFed in his department were basic scientists. The article implies all 3 have the same skill set. They do not. Welcome to Texas by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2009-04-01 16:35:42] This kind of behavior is a tradition in Texas. UTMB isn't the first to engage in chicanery against its faculty and it won't be the last. The social atmosphere and value system here is what makes people like Tom Delay and Phil Gramm possible. Institutions Sminstitutions? by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2009-04-01 13:15:23] This is nothing new, as a previous poster suggests. When I was a child I watched my father lose his job as a salesman for a major food supplier, a company that had long since been absorbed twice and finally by Kraft Foods, in the U.S.. At that time in history, the stigma of losing one?s job was much worse than it is today. Now, the idea seems to be to change careers, not necessarily jobs, every six years or so. In science this was not really the case since most of us are specialists and experts at what we do. I also find that when the ultimate nightmare occurs, that we lose our position, that we have a much more difficult time fending off those just coming out of college or grad school with the cutting edge techniques. In fact the older more experienced scientist that has a background in a specific area is more obsolete than useful (please! prove me wrong since I am now over 5 years unemployed from science). But what really seems to be occurring is that we must go where the jobs are. So pack-up and move; and by the way we, the company, can no longer afford the expense of the move or the cost of your reeducation to come up to the necessary level of skills we, the company, desire. And while you, the potential employee, are moving all over the U.S. (or the world for that matter) it becomes necessary to discard and lighten rather than build and improve your personal lifestyle and associated belongings. But don?t worry your work days will be much longer so you won?t need all that stuff anyway. Property ownership, you don?t need that either, since you?ll be moving all over the place just to survive. Sound familiar; what was it that Ross Peroe (I think that?s how it?s spelled) said? ?You?ll hear the sucking sound of jobs leaving the U.S.?? We?ve entered survival mode folks. This story is more of the same ugliness that?s all around. Great Depression II? Regents' Rule 31003, Sec. 3.6 by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2009-04-01 00:49:14] Regents' Rule 31003, Sec. 3.6 states that "Any person terminated due to financial exigency will be notified when a vacancy occurs in the same institution in their field of teaching within the next two academic years following the termination. If such person makes timely application and is qualified for the position to be filled, they shall be offered employment in that position."
That Sec. makes two important points: (1)the fired faculty should be informed that a vacancy occured; (2) the fired faculty does not need to have a funded grant to be rehired in the same position, but only to show that he/she is still "qualified" for that position. Therefore, UTMB departments that are hiring new faculty would have to first use Sec. 3.6 before a new faculty is actually hired (in the same position) in a given department. The letter Dean Anderson sent to fired faculty (dated November 24, 2008) is also very explicit on this point. Therefore, if a given chair wants to avoid a violation of Sec. 3.6. he or she would have to wait for at least two years after the termination of a given faculty to make a decision regarding the hiring of new faculty. It appears, however, that Sec. 3.6 has already being violated by several chairs at UTMB (according to the article dated March 31, 2009 in The Scientist). I've heard nothing good about UTMB... by Sergio Vasquez [Comment posted 2009-03-31 15:53:44] Apparently, there is also some infighting going on amongst faculty concerning the medical curriculum, at least anecdotally -- I have half a dozen peers who complain about the focus of the medical teaching faculty.
The administration of UTMB better tighten up their standards and ethics because word of mouth is going to depress interest from top candidates, faculty and students alike. It's all a change in focus by Duane Couchot-Vore [Comment posted 2009-03-31 13:42:42] This is what we can expect given that our universities are becoming less and less institutions of higher learning and research and more and more simply businesses. How can we expect to engender any respect for education among the public when our leading institutions themselves so shoddily disrespect it? Avoiding Waste of Talents by Hongrong Cai, MD [Comment posted 2009-03-31 13:22:16] We really need a systemic maintainance for experts to stay in their positions to continue their creative activities. Unfortunately, this is not new. by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2009-03-31 11:43:26] I think you will find that similar actions took place at some Louisiana institutions (higher and secondary education) after Hurricane Katrina. Comment on this blog |