The Scientist : NewsBlog Print: Fired faculty speak out
The Scientist: NewsBlog:
Fired faculty speak out
Posted by Elie Dolgin
[Entry posted at 4th December 2008 04:37 PM GMT]

Tenured professors who were given the pink slip last week by the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) in Galveston said they felt "shocked" and "betrayed" by the action, and have been given little rationale for why they were singled out, and little direction on what to do until they leave.

In total, the medical school fired more than 3,000 people -- around one-third of its total staff, including 83 tenured and tenure track faculty and 44 non-tenure track researchers -- after Hurricane Ike tore through the campus in September.

Tenured and tenure-track professors who were fired will be paid though August. Until then, however, whether they keep working or not to finish up research projects or teaching obligations is between the fired researcher and their department head, according to William New, UTMB's associate dean for research administration.

Associate professor Malcolm Brodwick worked at UTMB for 35 years before being sacked last week. Although he doesn't have his own research grant at the moment, he is actively engaged in collaborative biophysics research and is the course director for the cardiovascular/pulmonary graduate program. That's why, when he heard there were going to be layoffs, "I thought that I was going to be immune," he told The Scientist.

His department chair called him into his office last Monday (Nov. 24) to tell him the bad news. Around 10 people from his department -- neuroscience and cell biology -- were fired under the so-called "reduction in force" (RIF), but Brodwick was the first to know because his department chair told everyone in alphabetical order. "I was a little shocked when I learned I was RIFed," he said. "I wasn't prepared."

Brodwick's department chair, Henry Epstein, told him there were external guidelines for choosing who was given the boot, but these directives have never been made public, Brodwick said. "I think [I was fired] because I'm 64 and close to retirement."

Epstein declined to comment about the specific guidelines, saying only: "It was a very careful, thoughtful process. It wasn't done overnight."

Responding to Brodwick's allegation and to requests for the criteria used in choosing faculty in the layoffs, UTMB spokesperson Raul Reyes sent The Scientist the following statement: "Faculty decisions were made in accordance with the UT System Regents Rules, which require committee review for the elimination of academic programs and positions. The rules specify the factors to consider, which include academic qualifications and talents, the needs of the programs, past academic performance and potential future contributions. Tenure was considered only if two or more individuals were equally qualified."

Brodwick said he now plans to fulfill his teaching obligations through mid-January, and then he will start looking for new work. In the meantime, however, Brodwick said he feels "like a leper, a pariah on campus. I'm not 100% a faculty member."

Nancy Wills -- a tenured professor also in the department neuroscience and cell biology, a member of the faculty senate, and the director of UTMB's systems physiology graduate course -- has had a tough year. After a financially difficult divorce, two salary cuts, a family illness, the loss of her home in the hurricane, and a major car accident, she learned of her termination in an email.

Wills, 59, said she plans to retire when her contract runs out in August. Despite years of grant funding, including being one of last year's grant recipients from the blindness-research foundation Hope For Vision, her highest salary was at the lowest quartile for her field, and she in unsure how she'll make ends meet.

"Everyone is so fearful," Kay Sandor, a tenured associate professor of nursing, told The Scientist. "Whether we speak or not, our jobs are at risk."

Sandor was not fired last week, but was one of the co-claimants -- along with the Texas Faculty Association, a local merchant, and a retired UTMB employee -- who filed a lawsuit Tuesday (Dec. 2) against University of Texas officials for breaching the Texas Open Meetings Act. "I took a big risk," she said, "[but] I think it's important that at least one faculty person was in that suit."

Mary Kanz, an associate professor of pathology who has worked at UTMB since 1979, realized she was being fired "as soon as my chairperson's secretary called and said he needed to speak with me," she told The Scientist.

Kanz's meeting with her department chair consisted of three sentences: One, she was told her faculty position "no longer existed." Two, she'd continue to be paid through August, but was expected to perform her regular duties. Three, "I want to thank you for your contributions to this department," Kanz recalled.

Kanz's grant funding ran out in January 2007, and she's mostly been teaching since then. "If you don't have grant funding, you're basically considered a second-class citizen," she said.

At 65, she said she plans to retire when her contract runs out. "I had hoped to have one more year to put more money in my savings account, but that won't be happening now."

Another newly out-of-work faculty member, a tenured associate professor and director of a graduate program who asked to remain anonymous, told The Scientist that she felt "bitter and betrayed and thrown away."

"I kind of feel like I've spent most of my career in service to UTMB," she said, noting that like many of the other faculty fired, she does a lot of teaching and administrative work. "It's a horrible feeling."

The Texas Faculty Association is asking fired faculty members who wish to appeal the termination decision to contact them. Under of the University of Texas Board of Regents rule 31003, they have 30 days from the date they were first notified of the layoff to do so.


Related stories:
  • Texas profs sue university
    [2nd December 2008]
  • Texas med center to lay off 3,800
    [13th November 2008]

  •  

    Rate this article

    Rating: 4.03/5 (32 votes )





    academia should not look like industry
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2008-12-09 07:58:36]
    1. The fire of the professors makes people think that the university is like a company, which should not be.
    2. The whole society tends to reward the "boss", especially the "BIG boss" (those CEOs, and professors with 20 postdocs), but not those who do the basic yet essential work like lectures, technicians.
    3. At least in Biology, professors tends to spend most of their time attending meetings, writing papers and grants, no matter you like it or not. Many of them lost the root in the lab. Some are depends on their postdocs or graduates to make breakthroughs. Thus, the professors looks more like a "sales man" + "marketing man" + "CFO" now for those labs.



    Under Insured
    by Patrick Crothers

    [Comment posted 2008-12-09 02:06:00]
    I understand that UTMB sustained 700 millions in damages and had 100 millions in insurance coverage for huricain damages. Sustainable practices are just now being considered in the UT system.
    UT Arlington was ranked by The Princeton Review for sustainable practices. They finished 386TH out of a field of 386. Two years ago in order to decrease insurance costs, UTA cut down two 200+ year old oak trees to avoid possible roof damage to student housing. With out the shade from these trees, my air conditioner ran non-stop for four months. UT pays the electric here.

    My point is this is a systemic failure of a institution that has lost all track of putting academics first. Taking risks with the publics money does not belong in public education.

    From the lowest levels where they destroy the environment for short term gain to the highest where students get robbed of the professors that are their mentors the UT system has lost sight that they are here to serve the public and not the other way around.

    UT does more than play football. It is a world class university system with professors who have increased man's knowledge considerably.

    I hope someone will stand up and bring integrity back to the system.



    If they didn't have enough qualifications to be kept...
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2008-12-08 13:06:24]
    probably so do the great majority of their peers in other institutions around the country, especially if they are judged solely on their own merits, as should be, but rarely are. That's the ugly reality of academia. I, for one, speak from my own personal experience because my own doctoral mentor was a high-ranking, tenured professor who was a great politician but a miserable researcher and an unethical person. Also, the article states

    "The rules specify the factors to consider, which include academic qualifications and talents, the needs of the programs, past academic performance and potential future contributions."

    But, there are really no standards or objective job reviewers to judge the faculty fairly within a large academic institution, much less across multiple institutions.

    On the other hand, the layoffs occurred in Texas, a prime example of the South where union-busting corporate culture and politics permeates even the academia, and where a tenured-track is still viewed mostly as some sort of academic welfare.



    Reward for Honesty
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2008-12-06 08:39:08]
    Apparently these faculties are honest and sincere not being able to master the art manipulating the data by hiring the cheap labor from third world countries to win RO1 grants to sustain the faculty position.



    Science and scientist cant survive on a charitable system
    by mabrouk el-sharkawy

    [Comment posted 2008-12-05 11:12:48]
    The layoff-in-mass occuring at UTMB clearly indicated the incompetence of a scientific system run by a "charitable-like operation". No excuse whatsoever can justify such an irresponsible decision while huge amount of tax payer money is wasted on useless wars,on an incompetent administration at Washington DC, and on bailouts of deceptive financial system such as the recent crisis at Wall Street and banking system. It is well-established that a dollar invested in science leads to more than ten-fold value in social benefits along time. In a nutshell the episode at UTBM is a shamefull event that should be corrected.



    Shameful
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2008-12-04 15:56:25]
    Considering the size of the University of Texas system that spans the entire state, one would have hoped that UT would have had the sense to relocate these profs to other institutions/cities. This is shameful and embarrassing to UT and academia on a whole. Like it or not, these profs *are* victims of the UT system.



    Faculty schedules
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2008-12-04 12:58:17]
    What misery. It probably sounds generous to say they will be paid through August, but not when you understand that many faculty jobs only come around once a year and many of those starting Sept 1, 2009 have already been filled (or have moved beyond evaluating and selecting applications and into the interview stage).



    Comment on this blog