|
The Scientist: NewsBlog:
Iowa biologist falsified figures
Posted by Elie Dolgin [Entry posted at 11th November 2008 03:55 PM GMT]
Rate this article
Misconduct by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2008-11-18 16:52:43] It seems everyone knows someone who fabricated data. Most often when I hear discussion of this topic, the scientist involved notified their department chairman, only to be told to get rid of the person. Then he/she becomes someone else problem. The current education on research ethics is insufficient. This problem is bigger than anyone recognizes. Sad state of affairs by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2008-11-18 11:20:26] I wonder what provokes research misconduct....is it frustration,boredom ,laziness? or do these people get a thrill out of getting away with it.It is nice to note that there was atleast an investigation that proved the misconduct in IOWA...I've been in places where things have been just hushed up...I hate the fact that these people call themselves scientists...these people go through rigorous training and face lot of failures..which should actually make them humble..why do they have petty egos..I don't think this post is racist..the one I worked for was not Asian and he had the audacity to fabricate data...only he got away with it... Naming Names by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2008-11-15 17:12:55] There was no reason to name the innocent researchers victimized by this cheater. An example of a reporter wanting a better news story by saying Dr. XX declined to comment. Reporters are all the same. prejudice by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2008-11-14 14:31:01] Oh yeah, scientists are so racist. Please put the race card back in the box. It has no power among people who are not ignorant and on which the shoe doesn't fit. The stereotypes I've heard about my Asian brothers and sisters are that they work very hard and are therefore smart. If only we all suffered such slander. ? by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2008-11-13 13:45:52] I am not surprised. Among any groups of scientists (as well as general populations), there are certain % of ?bad guys?. You could investigate any group to prove my assumptions. If there are more Asian scientists, there should have more such scandals, even though I am not sure whether he is guilty ? things are more likely to be more complicated than we were told.
I wish it was that simple, Susan by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2008-11-13 09:41:42] and in the ideal world it should be so. But, unfortunately, biases and prejudice even influence what constitutes a "solid work" and its clear explanation, at the discretion of those who judge it. Science may be objective, but scientists are not - simply because scientists are also humans. As for the scientific integrity and talent, if those were as good as should be by some uniform standards which I don't even know if exist, then the published results lot clearer and more significant should be the norm, not the exception, as seems to be the situation. False data, ethnicity issues by Susan Gurney [Comment posted 2008-11-12 14:13:09] Let's face it - there is no particular discrimination against Asian scientists who
do solid work, and can clearly explain their data. You either have or do not have scientific integrity and talent. I'm a bit relieved that he wasn't another Korean by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2008-11-12 14:01:33] Because the notorious incident of the falsified stem cell research by Dr. Hwang Woo-Suk of Korea dealt a serious blow to the credibility and psyche of other Korean researchers collectively. However, it still looks bad on all ethnic Asian scientists who aren't often distinguished by their nationalities by the Westerners. Let's face it, Asian scientist still don't get the due respect they deserve from their Western peers, even if they deserve it, and this kind of incident only hurts their chances. Comment on this blog |