The Scientist : NewsBlog Print: Iowa biologist falsified figures
The Scientist: NewsBlog:
Iowa biologist falsified figures
Posted by Elie Dolgin
[Entry posted at 11th November 2008 03:55 PM GMT]

Former University of Iowa molecular biologist, Jusan Yang, falsified several figures in an unpublished manuscript and at two scientific meetings, the US Public Health Service's Office of Research Integrity (ORI) reported last week.

Yang, a postdoc in John Engelhardt's lab from 1997-2002 and an assistant research scientist in Curt Sigmund's lab from 2002-2005, presented falsified data at the American Heart Association's Council for High Blood Pressure Research meeting in September 2003 and at the Experimental Biology meeting in April 2004 claiming to show that four different RNA interference vectors inhibit a transcription factor that regulates expression of the blood-pressure enzyme, renin.

A manuscript containing the erroneous results -- entitled "Increased renin transcription after inhibition of NF-YA with RNAi reveals through regulation of Ea element and Ear2" -- was in preparation but was never submitted. Yang's bogus findings were also initially included in an NIH grant application, which was rewritten to remove Yang's data before submission.

The University of Iowa launched an inquiry into Yang's findings in March 2005 when "the leadership of the laboratory identified some anomalies, and were very concerned about the irreproducibility of some of the results," Richard Hichwa, associate vice president for research at the University of Iowa and the former research integrity officer who oversaw Yang's investigation, told The Scientist.

Hichwa refused to say which laboratory -- Engelhardt's or Sigmund's -- he was referring to. The questionable data presented at the 2003 American Heart Association meeting was co-authored with Sigmund alone. Both Sigmund and Engelhardt declined to comment, as did former Iowa professor, Robin Davisson, now at Cornell University, who co-authored papers with Yang in 2003 and 2006.

The university's 13-month investigation -- longer than usual because "Dr. Yang was not very helpful," according to Hichwa -- reviewed Yang's data, lab books, excel files, and images, as well as directly queried Yang through his lawyer, and concluded that Yang falsified five figures in his manuscript. In one figure, a Western blot was mislabeled and inappropriately enhanced in Photoshop. Throughout the manuscript, Yang claimed that each figure was based on four independent repetitions, when the actual number of repetitions ranged from one to three. Standard error bars and levels of statistical significance were also inaccurately reported. Several of these figures appeared in Yang's two conference presentations, too.

"He falsified and fabricated data," said Hichwa. "He declared that he had a number of replicate measurements when he did not. Really what it comes down to was he was not able to recreate or provide support for his original findings."

None of the falsified data were ever published in peer-review journals, and no problems were found with Yang's previous results, including first-author papers published in the Journal of Virology (cited in 74 papers, according to ISI) and Molecular Therapy (cited in 14 papers), Hichwa said.

"The ORI concurred with the University of Iowa's findings," John Dahlberg, director of the ORI's division of investigative oversight, wrote in an E-mail. But the "ORI does not consider this a major misconduct case; the amount of misconduct was limited and no falsified data was published."

According to the University of Iowa's records, Yang earned a MD from the West China University of Medical Sciences in Chengdu (now Sichuan University), a Master's in cardiology from the Chongqing University of Medical Sciences, and a PhD in molecular medicine from the Third Military Medical University in Chongqing. From 1987-1993, Yang worked at the Central Hospital of Wanxian Prefecture, first as a resident and then as a cardiology clinical fellow. From 1993-1996, he was the director of science development and technique transfer at the Chongqing University of Medical Sciences. In August 1997, he joined the University of Iowa.

Yang voluntarily left the University of Iowa in August 2005 after the university's July 2005 inquiry report called for a full-blown investigation of misconduct. At the time, he was earning $49,052.

Yang is currently volunteering in a health care facility in California toward obtaining his certification to practice medicine in the US, and is not employed anywhere that receives Public Health Service funding, Dahlberg said. The Scientist was unable to contact Yang, whose specific whereabouts are unknown.

 

Rate this article

Rating: 4.25/5 (32 votes )





Misconduct
by anonymous poster

[Comment posted 2008-11-18 16:52:43]
It seems everyone knows someone who fabricated data. Most often when I hear discussion of this topic, the scientist involved notified their department chairman, only to be told to get rid of the person. Then he/she becomes someone else problem. The current education on research ethics is insufficient. This problem is bigger than anyone recognizes.



Sad state of affairs
by anonymous poster

[Comment posted 2008-11-18 11:20:26]
I wonder what provokes research misconduct....is it frustration,boredom ,laziness? or do these people get a thrill out of getting away with it.It is nice to note that there was atleast an investigation that proved the misconduct in IOWA...I've been in places where things have been just hushed up...I hate the fact that these people call themselves scientists...these people go through rigorous training and face lot of failures..which should actually make them humble..why do they have petty egos..I don't think this post is racist..the one I worked for was not Asian and he had the audacity to fabricate data...only he got away with it...



Naming Names
by anonymous poster

[Comment posted 2008-11-15 17:12:55]
There was no reason to name the innocent researchers victimized by this cheater. An example of a reporter wanting a better news story by saying Dr. XX declined to comment. Reporters are all the same.



prejudice
by anonymous poster

[Comment posted 2008-11-14 14:31:01]
Oh yeah, scientists are so racist. Please put the race card back in the box. It has no power among people who are not ignorant and on which the shoe doesn't fit. The stereotypes I've heard about my Asian brothers and sisters are that they work very hard and are therefore smart. If only we all suffered such slander.



?
by anonymous poster

[Comment posted 2008-11-13 13:45:52]
I am not surprised. Among any groups of scientists (as well as general populations), there are certain % of ?bad guys?. You could investigate any group to prove my assumptions. If there are more Asian scientists, there should have more such scandals, even though I am not sure whether he is guilty ? things are more likely to be more complicated than we were told.



I wish it was that simple, Susan
by anonymous poster

[Comment posted 2008-11-13 09:41:42]
and in the ideal world it should be so. But, unfortunately, biases and prejudice even influence what constitutes a "solid work" and its clear explanation, at the discretion of those who judge it. Science may be objective, but scientists are not - simply because scientists are also humans. As for the scientific integrity and talent, if those were as good as should be by some uniform standards which I don't even know if exist, then the published results lot clearer and more significant should be the norm, not the exception, as seems to be the situation.



False data, ethnicity issues
by Susan Gurney

[Comment posted 2008-11-12 14:13:09]
Let's face it - there is no particular discrimination against Asian scientists who
do solid work, and can clearly explain their
data. You either have or do not have scientific
integrity and talent.



I'm a bit relieved that he wasn't another Korean
by anonymous poster

[Comment posted 2008-11-12 14:01:33]
Because the notorious incident of the falsified stem cell research by Dr. Hwang Woo-Suk of Korea dealt a serious blow to the credibility and psyche of other Korean researchers collectively. However, it still looks bad on all ethnic Asian scientists who aren't often distinguished by their nationalities by the Westerners. Let's face it, Asian scientist still don't get the due respect they deserve from their Western peers, even if they deserve it, and this kind of incident only hurts their chances.



Comment on this blog