|
The Scientist: NewsBlog:
Publishing bias out of the bottle
Posted by Elie Dolgin [Entry posted at 18th March 2008 08:06 PM GMT]
Rate this article
Another perspective by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2008-03-25 08:47:36] Most of my best ideas occur over a beer with other colleagues, so I'd argue the opposite - that beer drinking is conducive to the open exchange of ideas in a comfortable environment. Of course, the very best ideas could well occur when you are so plastered that you can't remember them the next morning ! Buffalo theory - counterpoint by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2008-03-24 10:41:42] Of course, there is the Buffalo theory - "A herd of buffalo can only move as fast as the slowest buffalo and when the herd is hunted, it is the slowest and weakest ones at the back that are killed first. This natural selection is good for the herd as a whole, because the general speed and health of the whole group keeps improving by the regular killing of the weakest members. In much the same way, the human brain can only operate as fast as the slowest brain cells. Now, as we know, excessive drinking of alcohol kills brain cells. But naturally, it attacks the slowest and weakest brain cells first. In this way, regular consumption of beer eliminates the weaker brain cells, making the brain a faster and more efficient machine. And that, Norm, is why you always feel smarter after a few beers" - Norm from Cheers Comments on the bias out of the bottle by PONS H MOE [Comment posted 2008-03-22 10:05:30] I salute the authors of this very educational and highly informative article on the above subject. This will surely help others on understanding the bottling process of beer. I hope the authors will continue more researches on this field.
it's a joke by Dung Le [Comment posted 2008-03-21 16:11:56] I agree to previous post that this is not statistically sounded report.
The first survey conducted on less than 18, the second on less than 34, all of them working on the same field and living in 1 country. This report has nothing better than to increase click-per-day for the journal and some other news agencies. NYTimes has commentary about this too. It can also serve and a joke to boot sleepy people in the lab though. Time it takes to down a bottle by Fred Mast [Comment posted 2008-03-21 14:08:47] While there may definitely be a trend between litres of beer consumed and impact of papers published. A statistic is not evidence for cause-and-effect. Do ornithologist's who guzzle 200 litres of beer per year spend as much time on a paper as their more self-restrained colleagues? ... More on Anders Moller by Ivan Oransky [Comment posted 2008-03-21 13:21:05] For more on Anders Moller and some of the questions others have raised about his work, see The Scientist's January 2007 feature:
LINK Ivan Oransky former deputy editor The Scientist Comment on this blog |