|
The Scientist: NewsBlog:
Another HIV microbicide a bust
Posted by Andrea Gawrylewski [Entry posted at 18th February 2008 02:01 PM GMT]
Rate this article
Be careful of jumping to conclusions regarding ethics by steve clark [Comment posted 2008-02-24 08:59:14] To the folks worried about different aspects of ethical design of this study, I recommend caution. This short article does not provide enough information to evaluate the ethics of the trial design. While attention to proper design is commendable, jumping to conclusions can affect the ability of such trials to continue. Please check the full publication for study details and then make specific points regarding study design. Specific criticism is very helpful, generalizations are harmful to the conduct of clinical trials. Thanks. more uninformed blabber about microbicides by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2008-02-24 01:27:32] People, get your facts straight and understand what's really going on before you mouth off! This was some incredibly well-intentioned, carefully done, commendable, ethically caring, and as scientifically rigorous as possible given the challenges work. I say that as someone who has no vested interest or involvement in the work but was a close observer and visited the clinical trial sites during the course of the study. If you think you can do better, get off your computer chairs, stop mouthing off in an uninformed way, and do something about the 1 million new HIV infections among people globally every year. experimental design by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2008-02-20 14:08:46] I suspect this study was done on women in the "sex trades". It's well known that condom use, while rising, is not well regarded within these trades because the "customer base" doesn't like it. So, in this case, is it unethical? For people who are likely not to use the known effective methods, is it ok to suggest this method and record the results.
I agree, it feels wrong, but was there an alternative? Non-oxynol 9 fiasco by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2008-02-19 15:30:05] This reminds me of the Non-oxynol 9 trial. A spermacide that was supposed to help prevent AIDS, (also used on 3rd world women) Instead it actually increased the chances of AIDS with the minute tears (much like asbesto cuts) So what did they do but bring it to the USA and gave it out to the 'free' clinics. It's in spermacides and many lubricated condoms, and many women suffered the effects of it's burning and severe irritation to the genitals. *sigh*
CABs Should not allow U.S. sites to be excluded by Yaa Simpson [Comment posted 2008-02-19 13:33:38] Greetings,
I am glad to see efforts to develop an effective microbicide is continually being pursued. However, I also question the study design, not only with adherence issues, but the fact that women were exposed without any other measures of protection. Is this an ethical issue for a study to allow natural risk vs. possibly a false sense of protection? Based on the numbers it seams that the HIV positivity rate for 6,202 women was about 4.5%. That appears to be relatively high as compared to the less than 3% HIV positivity rate for various U.S. sites. I would encourage the protocol team to reconsider including U.S. sites as well. I am no longer comfortable with doing trials in other countries without including U.S. sites. It is unethical and members of community advisory boards should not allow for this to happen again. Sista Yaa, Community Epidemiologist for The Association of Clinical Trials (TACTS) Premature or at least Upside-down by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2008-02-18 13:19:41] The last paragraph of this article should have been near the top. Or perhaps the title should have been, "Clinical Trial invalid since 90% of participants refused to follow protocol." It won't matter how many anti-virals they add to their gel if people are unwilling to use it "religiously".
Baxter Zappa unethical trial by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2008-02-18 12:47:05] I am taken aback that this study design was permitted. I doubt it would be approved in the U.S. An experimental design using a placebo likely gives women a false sense of security and may greatly affect the decision to have unprotected sex. I also can't belive 285 women contracted HIV before the study was halted. The participants are randomly choosed? by Fukai Bao [Comment posted 2008-02-18 12:30:19] This a key question. Comment on this blog |