Speaking of Science
Two responses to Edge.org?s The World Question Center 2011: Human beings tend almost invariably to be better at remembering evidence that is consistent with their beliefs than evidence that might disconfirm them?.Overcoming this mental weakness, known as confirmation bias, is a lifelong struggle; recognizing that we all suffer from it is an important first step. This biotech century will be microbe enhanced and maybe microbe inspired?.Confronting a difficult problem we might fruitfully ask, ?What would a microbe do?? The Anthropocene, on current evidence, seems to show global change consistent with the suggestion that an epoch-scale boundary has been crossed within the last two centuries. The easiest way to manipulate the press is to embargo some result and then send a press release about it to a thousand different news organizations. Science is?an unending argument between a great multitude of voices. It resembles Wikipedia much more than it resembles the Encyclopaedia Britannica. There is a desperate need to develop methods with the same precision for an individual?s environmental exposure as we have for the individual?s genome. I would like to suggest that there is need for an ?exposome? to match the ?genome.? Send us timely and interesting quotes, along with context, to quotes@the-scientist.com. Advertisement
Rate this article
|
Register for FREE Online Access
Subscribe to the Magazine