Baby bellies

© SPL / Photo Researchers, Inc.

The paper:

C. Palmer et al., “Development of the human infant intestinal microbiota,” PLoS Biol, 5:1556–63, 2007. (Cited in 101 papers)

The finding:

Chana Davis and her team at Stanford University School of Medicine designed a microarray to sequence small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) from microbes present in more than 400 excrement samples from 14 healthy infants, starting with the first excrement after birth, to map out normal development of the gut ecosystem. They found that each individual infant had a unique microbial ecosystem that varied over time but remained distinct from other infants’. A pair of fraternal twins had gut environments that remained remarkably similar to each other over time, indicating the strong impact of environment.

The unexpected:

“We were surprised to find that each individual is really unique. There is no average baby,” says Davis (née Palmer).

The impact:

“This paper is one of the first and one of the best examples of using a new genomic technology [microarray] to simultaneously characterize many microbial samples over an extended time course,” says Jonathan Eisen, a geneticist at the University of California, Davis.

The follow-up:

More research has illustrated the role gut microbes play in disease and metabolism, such as a person’s predisposition to obesity (Nature, 457:480–84, 2009).

Bacterial breakdown in samples:
Phylum Number of Sequences Relative Abundance
Proteobacteria 1,590 46.14%
Firmicutes 1,103 32.01%
Bacteroidetes 692 20.08%
Actinobacteria 44 1.28%
Verrucomicrobia 15 0.44%
Fusobacteria 2 0.06%


Advertisement


 

Rate this article

Rating: 3.16/5 (37 votes )





Nursing or bottle fed
by Sylvia LeDoux

[Comment posted 2010-02-02 21:03:36]
This is great work!

I would be curious to see the difference between nursing and bottle fed flora.

I see this as a great diagnostic tool of the future since 70% of the immune system is in the digestive tract.

Also can this method of identification work on viruses?






No S**t!
by anonymous poster

[Comment posted 2010-01-26 11:24:58]
Fascinating - the article does this story an injustice. More information about the relative merits of the study should have been discussed.






Front Cover

Register for FREE Online Access

  • »Current issue
  • »Best Places to Work and Salary surveys
  • »Daily news and monthly contents emails

Register »

Subscribe to the Magazine

  • »Monthly print issues
  • »Unlimited online access
  • »Special offers on books, apparel, and more

Subscribe »

Library Subscriptions
Recommend to a Librarian

Masthead | Contact | Advertise | Privacy Policy
© 1986-2012 The Scientist