|
|
|
WAPMC
|
The paper:
S. Lavergne and J. Molofsky, "Increased genetic variation and evolutionary
potential drive the success of an invasive grass," Proc Natl Acad Sci,
104:3883–8, 2007. (Cited in 37 papers)
The finding:
To compare genetic diversity between invasive and indigenous plants,
University of Vermont evolutionary ecologists Sébastien Lavergne and Jane Molofsky
measured allozyme variability and growth traits in reed canarygrass (Phalaris
arundinacea L.) from its native Europe and introduced populations in
North America. They found that both genetic diversity and heritable phenotypic
variation were greater in the invasive range than in the indigenous range, even at
the population margins.
The significance:
"Multiple introductions can produce evolutionary novelty that wasn't in
existence in the native range," says Stephen Keller of the University of Virginia.
Thus, repeated introductions of non-native species should help invasive species
better respond to global climate change, notes Molofsky.
The animal side:
Last year, researchers from the University of Montpellier in France showed
that an invasive population of freshwater snails on the island of Martinique
harbored a tremendous amount of genetic diversity stemming from repeated invasions
followed by genetic mixing (Curr Biol, 18:363–7, 2008). Every
introduction "resembles a keg of dynamite" that provides fuel for evolutionary
change, says Steve Novak, a plant ecologist at Boise State University.
The next step:
Lavergne and Molofsky are measuring reed canarygrass growth parameters in
both European and North American soils to test whether the novel invasive genotypes
are always superior regardless of locale, or only when the plants lack natural
enemies.
| Average genotypic diversity of reed canarygrass populations (Shannon-Weiner index): |
|
Vermont: 2.16 |
Czech Republic: 1.50 |
|
North Carolina: 1.79 |
France: 1.12 |