By Jeffrey M. Perkel
Freeze Frame
How to troubleshoot sample preparation for cryo-electron microscopy, an
up-and-coming structural biology technique.
Cryo-electron microscopy may be the new kid on the structural biology block,
but it is a technique on the rise. Although X-ray crystallography remains the
dominant technique for solving structures because of its fine atomic resolution, not
every protein (especially large complexes) will crystallize, and those that can are
sometimes not sufficiently abundant to work with. That's where cryoEM comes in.
CryoEM is a form of electron microscopy that produces
sub-nanometer-resolution 3D structures from 2D images of flash-frozen samples. It
takes four different forms, of which single particle reconstruction and
cryo-electron tomography are the most common variants. In the former, thousands of
individual complexes are imaged and computationally averaged to produce a 3D
rendering; in the latter, a sample is imaged from a variety of tilt angles to
reproduce a 3D volumetric structure, without averaging.
Typically, a sample is spotted onto a copper grid covered with a thin film of
holey carbon. (The sample is blotted with filter paper, which spreads the sample
into a layer 50-100 nm thick, quickly plunged into -170°C liquid ethane, and
imaged.)
The technique's success rests on sample preparation. Flash freezing, which
creates ice that is vitreous, like glass, rather than crystalline, preserves the
sample as it was in solution, avoiding the distortion that accompanies
crystallization. But it's a tricky process, influenced by variables such as
humidity, concentration, blotting time and force, and carbon thickness. "CryoEM is a
technique which is much younger than x-ray crystallography and therefore less mature
and less well documented," says Neil Ranson, a cryoEM specialist at the University
of Leeds, UK. "Certainly, specimen preparation is still a bit of a black art."
The Scientist asked five researchers how they approach the
sample-preparation problem. Here's what they said:
Mutational mimicry
|
|
A raw cryoEM image (left), and a slightly filtered cryoEM image from which the structure of GroEL-ATP was determined.
|
|
Courtesy of Neil Ranson
|
Researcher:
Neil Ranson, University Research Fellow, Astbury Center for Structural
Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, UK
Project:
Solving the structure of the molecular
chaperone protein GroEL complexed with ATP
Problem:
The ATP and ADP-bound forms of GroEL
represent different functional states, and presumably have different structures. But, how to
freeze the complex rapidly enough to prevent ATP hydrolysis?
Solution:
Ranson first tried
non-hydrolyzable ATP analogs, but that didn't work; they don't bind tightly enough to mimic
the desired functional state. So he tried a high-tech solution: spraying ATP at the grid as
it plunged towards the ethane. This reduced the amount of time GroEL was exposed to ATP
before freezing from 5 seconds to about 10 milliseconds, he says, "But, as you can imagine,
it becomes far more technically challenging." For instance, how can you tell where on the
grid the ATP was deposited? (solution: spike the ATP with colloidal gold).
That created
another problem: blotting the grids without damaging them. Thinner carbon films tended to
rip, but thicker ones meant thicker ice, which "changes the views of the molecule that you
get on the grid when you image it," he explains. "I spent more than a year of my life trying
to get this to work with a singular lack of success."
Finally, based on previously solved
structures of GroEL, he and his collaborators created a mutant with ATPase activity about 2%
that of wild-type-a subtle structural change that mimics the wild-type protein but works
slowly enough to capture the complex via standard plunge freezing methods
(Cell, 107:869-79, 2001). "The message is that informed biochemical knowledge
is a much quicker way of solving these problems than exotic freezing techniques," he
concludes.
|
Caution: fragile particles
|
|
Surface representation of a virus capsid reconstruction calculated
from cryo-electron micrographs (colors indicate the positions of capsomers and
decoration molecules) This virus, bacteriophage SPO1, is the first
non-herpesvirus to exhibit the same arrangement of capsomers previously
diagnostic of herpesvirus capsids. Such conserved structural features point to a
common ancestral virus that infected cells before the split into separate
domains. (Current Biol, 16:R11-13, 2001)
|
|
Courtesy of James Conway
|
Researcher:
James Conway, Associate Professor
of Structural Biology, University of
Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Project:
Single particle reconstruction of
virus capsids
Problem:
Viruses can be fragile; broken
capsids litter the EM grid with nucleic acid
and protein, cluttering the image.
Solution:
A cluttered grid is an indecipherable
grid. Thus, the key to good single particle
reconstruction is sample quality, says Conway.
In the case of virus particles, that means
samples that are fresh, intact, and at high
concentration-enough to get hundreds of
particles per micrograph. To maximize his
chances of success, Conway never stores
samples in the fridge for long. "As soon as I
get the sample I make frozen grids, because
if I leave them in the fridge for a couple of
days, just at 4°C, they will fall apart," he
says. "Ideally, you look at them at the same
time to check that you've made good ice
with good sample coverage in it."
He might make three grids with slightly
different blotting times, just to hedge his
bets. He also takes a quick "negative-stain"
transmission electron micrograph, to assess
sample quality and concentration, which
allows him to know in minutes if the sample
should be diluted (cryoEM "is pretty much
an all-day experiment," he explains).
"If you want to do yourself a favor," he
concludes, "you would treat a sample fresh,
and you'll go through the exercise of working
out how good it is in negative stain and what
kind of things you need to do to get a good
cryo grid, and you'll do that quickly, before it
has a chance to do anything untoward."
|
Vesicular wallpaper
|
|
An EM image of liposomes tethered to a streptavidin crystal, frozen in
a thin layer of vitreous ice. Left: raw micrograph; Right: the same after the
crystal periodicity is removed computationally; Inset: a model image of the
large liposome, which contains three copies of a membrane protein, the BK
potassium channel.
|
|
Courtesy of Liguo Wang and Fred Sigworth
|
Researcher:
Fred Sigworth, Professor of Cellular
and Molecular Physiology, Yale School
of Medicine
Project:
Determining the structure of the
BK ("big potassium") ion channel protein by
single particle reconstruction
Problem:
Traditionally, membrane-bound
proteins are removed from their membranes
with detergent, but how well detergentsolubilized
membrane proteins resemble
their in-membrane counterparts is unclear.
Sigworth wanted another approach.
Solution:
Sigworth went for membrane reconstitution.
He purifies the ion channel proteins
with detergent, and then replaces that detergent
with lipids to create vesicles, each of
which contains one or two protein molecules.
"So the idea now is, let's take pictures of these
things and let's treat the protein particles as
single particles and we'll do the same single
particle reconstruction business, but this time
it will be a protein in a membrane."
The approach allows Sigworth "to do a
couple of cool things," including ion transport
and membrane potential assays. But Sigworth
also wanted a way to quality-assess
his images. So, he "dopes" his liposomes with
biotinylated lipid, which he uses to attach
the micelles to the EM grid via a periodic 2D crystalline
streptavidin "wallpaper" that was
laid down on the grid previously.
"A crystallographer takes his or her
crystal to the x-ray machine, and they immediately
know whether they got good data
or not," he explains. But with cryoEM, "you
don't know how good your data are, because
the individual particles are so hard to see,
technically, you would say the signal-tonoise
ratio is below unity."
"So," he concludes, "what we wanted was
just a way to know whether or not we had a
good image, and the idea is to have a crystal
present that gives us that information."
And, because the streptavidin wallpaper is
periodic, it can be removed from the dataset
computationally, leaving only the vesicle
images for analysis.
|
Freezing for thickness
|
|
A 40 nm section of a cryo-electron tomogram of polyoma viruses within intact c127 host cells (red frame). Cell membranes can be seen best in an orthogonal orientation showing up as flexible lines. The filamentous structures to the left and at the bottom of the image are actin filaments. Insets show an average of virus particles that were extracted from a tomographic 3-D reconstruction. The smaller inset shows an inside view of the capsid.
|
|
Courtesy of Andreas Hoenger and Mary Morphew
|
Researcher:
Andreas Hoenger, Associate Professor
of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental
Biology, University of Colorado at Boulder
Project:
Studying microtubule dynamics and
associated proteins in structures such as mitotic
spindles using 3D cryo-electron tomography
Problem:
With thicknesses on the order of
microns, cells are too thick for direct cryoEM
imaging (which caps out at 300 nm or so).
How then to visualize proteins in situ?
Solution:
Standard freezing methods are
too slow for thick samples, so Hoenger uses
high-pressure freezing. Basically, the sample
is subjected to "a couple hundred bars" of
pressure in the presence of liquid nitrogen
(because the sample tends to heat up when
the pressure increases). Then the pressure is
rapidly released. "That [release] gives you a
flash freezing effect, which goes through the
entire tissue," Hoenger says. "Not only from the
outside but actually within the tissue itself."
Once the sample is frozen in this manner,
it is then sectioned (vitrified sectioning), just as
in a standard pathology lab, and imaged from a
variety of tilt angles to produce a 3D tomogram.
Cells present unique EM challenges: Unlike
in single-particle work, cells are chock-full of
biomolecules that are irrelevant to the experiment.
Microtubules are easily recognized in
a micrograph; how can you tell what proteins
are associated with it? "This is a big issue,"
Hoenger says. He and his colleagues are developing
methods to modify proteins so that they
will chelate heavy metals-something electron-
dense. It's the equivalent of GFP -tagging
in fluorescence microscopy, he says. "We try
to get a high-density signal so that we have a
dense blob there, which we can say, okay, that
must be this protein."
|
Stretch & stick
|
|
3D reconstruction of calcium release channel, top view (above) and side view (below).
|
|
Courtesy of
Wah Chiu, Irina Serysheva, Steven Ludtke, and Susan Hamilton
|
Researcher:
Irina Serysheva, Associate
Professor, Department of Biochemistry and
Molecular Biology, The University of Texas
Medical School, Houston
Project:
Single particle reconstruction of the
ryanodine receptor (RyR), a calcium release
channel in muscle cells
Problem:
Serysheva had two basic problems:
getting her detergent-solubized proteins to
stick to the grid, and doing so in such a way
that the particles would not have a preferred
orientation, but would orient randomly. RyR
has four-fold symmetry, and to solve its
structure, both side and top-down views of
the protein must be present.
Solution:
Servsheva chose to tweak her
carbon support film's surface chemistry.
Carbon supports can be continuous or
"holey," like Swiss cheese. In earlier studies
she used a continuous carbon support for
adhering protein particles to the EM grid,
but RyR particles tended to deposit with
preferred orientations on that surface.
When vitrified over a holey carbon grid,
protein particles orient randomly in a thin
film of aqueous solution that spans the
holes in the film.
But she also needed to tweak the surface's
hydrophobicity, to get the membrane
proteins to stick at all (because they are
solubilized in detergent, which exposes a
hydrophilic face to the grid). One approach
is called "glow discharge," in which Serysheva
applies an electrical current to the
grid. Another strategy: wash the grids in
organic solvents before using them.
Serysheva says long experience provides
her the expertise to look at the ice she gets
from a freezing run and then know how
to proceed to optimize vitrification. Given
a new membrane protein, she says she
would opt for holey film, glow discharge it
("because usually commercial grids are very
hydrophobic"), and then freeze. "If it doesn't
work, I will put continuous carbon and see
what's going to happen," she says.
|
Tools of the Trade
1. The Vitrobot
Though plunge freezing can be done manually, many researchers have migrated to an automated freezing instrument called a Vitrobot (vitrification robot), which controls for factors that make manual plunge freezing so difficult, including humidity and the force and duration of blotting.
"Whoever starts working with me, I encourage everyone, move on and just use Vitrobot," says Serysheva, "because the learning curve for manual freezing usually is very steep." Serysheva has two Vitrobots from FEI, and is preparing to get a third. Each costs about $70,000.
2. High-Pressure Freezing
Daniela Nicastro, Assistant Professor of Biology at Brandeis University, uses high-pressure freezing for her research into cellular structures in situ. She recently purchased a BalTech HPM-100 (now sold by Leica), which costs about $210,000, she says (Leica's alternative, the EM PACT2, costs about the same, she says). Both systems feature a "rapid transfer unit" that can quickly shunt a sample from a light microscope to the freezing apparatus, which allows the researcher to correlate the light and electron microscopic information of the same cells.
3. Freeze Substitution
Between freezing and sectioning, says Nicastro, many researchers perform "freeze substitution," in which water in the sample is slowly replaced with organic solvents like acetone at around -80°C. The addition of fixatives and contrasting agents (e.g., osmium tetroxide and uranyl acetate), as well as the resin embedding are also performed at low temperatures.
"By doing this at really low temperatures everything moves much slower and you don't get the same structural distortions and extractions of your specimen," she says. "So it's a much softer way of preparing your specimen for EM." Leica's EM AFS2 automated freeze substitution device costs about $35,000.
4. Cryoultramicrotome
To cut sections, Nicastro uses a cryoultramicrotome, essentially a souped-up deli slicer. The specimen "block" sits in a box above a pool of liquid nitrogen, whose vapor cools the sample and diamond knife to temperatures below -130°C. Nicastro then cuts "really thin slivers of somewhere between 50 to 300 nanometers thickness from the block face," she says.
The technique is difficult and prone to artifacts, Nicastro cautions, "because the specimen is very brittle and there's no real fluid at these low temperatures that will have the same properties that water has (e.g., surface tension) helping with the floating of the sections and working against the compression that you have through the sectioning."
Since the cryo-diamond knife is dry, the manufacturer specially treats the surface to make the sections slide better. Nicastro uses a little probe, like a toothpick with a thin hair attached, to catch the section as it emerges from the cryoblock face. "People are actually using things like eyelashes and Dalmatian hair tips, it's really sophisticated, like voodoo sometimes," she says. "It really is an art." The Leica cryo-ultramicrotome costs about $110,000.
Advertisement
Rate this article
Rating: 2.57/5 (14 votes )
|