Kishor Wasan, a pharmacologist at the University of British Columbia, needed
a negative control. It was 2000, and he was investigating a new way to deliver
anti-fungal drugs in pill form, generally cheaper and easier to administer than
intravenous injections. "I said, 'Let's take a drug I know doesn't work'," Wasan
recalls. He turned to amphotericin B, an antifungal membrane disruptor that Wasan
had studied a decade earlier for his PhD, and is not normally absorbed by the body
when administered orally. He embedded amphotericin B and a batch of other drugs into
his newly devised lipid-based delivery vehicle, and fed them to rats. This turned
out to be perhaps one of the worst negative control experiments ever - but a lucky
break for Wasan.
Compared to the other drug treatments, the rats on amphotericin B had the
highest blood levels and lowest kidney levels of the drug, indicating that the body
more readily absorbed amphotericin B than any other drug. What's more, oral
amphotericin B seemed to bypass the renal toxicity normally associated with
intravenous forms of the drug (Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 47:3339-42,
2003).
Wasan was bewildered: "I thought, what the heck is going on?" Further
experiments showed the drug was actually working: Amphotericin B fed to rats wiped
out Aspergillus fumigatus infections (Drug Dev Ind Pharm,
33:703-7, 2007), and 90% of Candida albicans kidney infections, which
is similar to the 95% success rate seen with intravenous delivery. All with no renal
toxicity. "The fact that we've got an oral formulation that's mimicking IV - that's a
major finding," Wasan says.
"Amp-B is basically the best antifungal agent we have; the problem with it is
that it has to be given IV and it's toxic," says David Stevens, a clinical
mycologist at the Santa Clara Valley Medical Center in San Jose, Calif. Eliminate
the need for IV and "they've got half the battle solved," he adds. "And if it's less
toxic, it's a home run."
Who will release the first oral fungicide?
Amphotericin B in poppable pill form could treat systemic fungal infections,
particularly in patients with cancer or HIV/AIDS. This may make it highly profitable
in the developed world, but it can also combat parasitic infections, such as
trypanosomiasis and visceral leishmaniasis, that are more prevalent in developing
nations. "We've got a first-world need where we can make money," says Wasan, "and a
third-world need where you can sell the drug at a subsidized cost."
To commercialize his formulation, in 2007 Wasan teamed up with the UBC
chapter of Universities Allied for Essential Medicines, an international
organization that aims to improve access to medicines and research on neglected
diseases at academic research institutions. In May 2008, Wasan licensed his oral
amphotericin B formulation to iCo Therapeutics, a Vancouver-based biotech company,
which agreed to make the drug available at a subsidized cost to combat leishmaniasis
in developing nations. It's a "win-win" situation, says John Clement, iCo's chief
business officer.
Wasan's amphotericin B formulation could prove to be the world's first
available oral fungicidal agent. (Pfizer's oral antifungal Diflucan (fluconazole)
stops fungal growth but does not kill the infectious agent.) But Raleigh, NC-based
BioDelivery Sciences International (BDSI) has its own oral formulation of
amphotericin B based on its patented Bioral delivery technology, which wraps the
drug in a coiling structure of alternating lipid layers, currently in phase I
trials. (Clearly, amphotericin B is more 'oral-izable' than originally believed.)
Still, Wasan thinks his drug, in preclinical trials, should have an advantage. His
formulation solubilizes the drug in a glyceride-based liquid, whereas Bioral relies
on a liposomal suspension, which can be difficult to bring up to a commercial scale,
he notes.
Raphael Mannino, BDSI's chief scientific officer, disagrees. "This is a very
simple manufacturing process," he says. What's more, BDSI's formulation is
effective, nontoxic, and "even in suspension, we have very long stability of our
product," he says.
The irony of Wasan's drug discovery, he notes, is that he didn't even want to
study amphotericin B again after finishing his PhD; he only resorted to the drug
because he expected it to fail. "Am I lucky as hell? Yes. Did I think it was going
to work? No. Am I fully believing it? Well, human studies will be needed to play
this out."