|
|
|
Melinda / wikimedia.org
|
User:
Jose Royo, Andalusian Center for Development Biology, Spain
Project:
Determining the role of genetic variations in the development of human
diseases and using this information to develop better drug targets
Problem:
Royo's group, then at Spanish biotech start-up Neocodex, had no SNP
genotyping platform, so sequencing was affordable on the low scale, and he generally
ran 5-15 SNPs in 1,000-2,000 samples. However, when medium-throughput projects
arose, Royo's group faced the problem of genotyping 50-200 SNPs in 500 samples. "The
investment in labeled oligos increased significantly the cost per sample," Royo
writes in an E-mail, because they were faced with designing a different labeled
primer for each SNP, the label being the most costly.
Solution:
Royo's group developed a "universal" labeled primer whose complementary
sequence was incorporated as a 5ˊ tail of the specific primers (Nat
Protoc, 2:1734-9, 2007). The protocol solves the problem and costs associated
with labeling specific primers, he writes. The biotinylated primer incorporates into
the specific PCR primer products, making it a "3-primer PCR," that leads right into
the pyrosequencing steps and the SNP detection.
One limitation is that "you cannot say a priori how the 3-primer PCR will
work and which stochiometry will be the best," Royo says. The stochiometry is tricky
because the biotinylated primer sometimes interferes with the other primers, which
can lower the PCR yield, so a researcher using this method would have to tweak the
different concentrations. "There are other groups that proposed a similar strategy
but using a different universal primer." There has been no comparison of the
different strategies yet, he notes.
Cost:
Each biotinylated primer costs around $80 to $95, while a 40-mer oligo costs
$20 to $30. Royo didn't have any platform costs to worry about, though.