Bridging the GulfBiotechs eager for newly minted PhDs are finding applicants with a lack of skills in dealing in a world where science and commerce must coexist
Invitrogen hired 1,000 life science PhDs worldwide last year, of whom roughly 30% were new graduates, and it expects to hire 1,000 more by the end of this year, says Rodney Moses, vice president for global talent acquisition for the Carlsbad, Calif.-based company. Fourteen percent of recently graduating PhDs expect to join the industry within two years of their postdocs,1 yet many of these new hires aren't ready to contribute meaningfully to the companies that need them. Invitrogen managers say that "they are great scientists, but when we bring them onboard, will they also understand how we bring our products to our customers?" says Moses. The answer is too often no. Life science PhD programs are typically geared toward allowing the student to learn enough laboratory skills to produce publishable data for the thesis, says Douglas Amorese, R&D manager for genomics business at Agilent Technologies in Palo Alto, Calif. Although these programs will give PhDs the required science training for a job in biotechnology, they do not provide all of the necessary skills to contribute meaningfully at companies, he says. For example, because PhD students' work is performed independently, it may not allow them to develop the outreach skills necessary for work outside of academic science, says Greg Dewey, vice president of academic affairs for the Keck Graduate Institute in Claremont, Calif. Other people
"We want people who work well with others," says David Smoller, vice president for R&D at Sigma-Aldrich in St. Louis. This is an absolutely necessary skill for biotech because teams execute all the projects, he says, and it is essential for all team members to work together to accomplish the task at hand. However, he adds that these are not teams of scientists like the ones to which students have become accustomed. Instead, they are multidisciplinary teams composed of scientists, marketing executives, project managers, financial managers, and so forth, with which the new PhD must establish a working relationship. Some new PhDs also lack a general awareness of how the biotech industry works. "The PhD is very deep and narrow and [does not] have the kind of awareness of some of the broader issues, such as the process of taking a drug from the lab to the market," says Dewey. This lack of awareness can manifest itself when the new PhD is exposed to the tight deadlines characteristic of biotech industry projects. For example, biotech companies may expect a scientist to develop a product within one year. "It's not like a postdoc where you can extend a project another six months or so. These are timelines and commitments that the organization is counting on," says Amorese. Also, new PhDs may not be aware that in biotech their project may change from year to year, says Smoller. Some biotech executives describe this lack of awareness of the industry as a lack of business acumen. Because business experience or business courses are not required during their training, PhD life scientists are not well known for their business smarts. Although this does not apply to all postdocs, of course, a majority of these new graduates do struggle to understand that biotech projects are not only designed to solve a biological problem, but also to turn a profit for the company, says Amorese. It is equally important, he notes, that new hires be able to convert this understanding quickly into practice within the company. Not ready for prime time
For new hires adapting to this environment, experience has no substitute. So some companies have initiated internship and fellowship programs in which new PhD life scientists can receive their postdoctoral training in-house. "We have an internship program where the postdocs come in and are either assigned a project or design their own project," says Moses. The program acts as a biotech industry crash course for postdocs and gives the company a steady supply of soon-to-be biotech-savvy scientists. Schering-Plough BioPharma in Palo Alto, Calif., offers another example of this approach with its Postdoctorate Research Fellowship Program (www.spbpostdoc.com/careers/index.html). In some companies, the hiring managers prefer to hire PhDs who have spent at least some time in the biotech industry. Even if the PhDs have worked in the biotech industry for only a couple of years, says Amorese, they know the goals and objectives of industry. "Sometimes when we get folks right out of graduate school or from a postdoc and they end up not being a perfect match for us, lots of time it is because they are not used to working under tight timelines." So Agilent tends to hire only people with biotech experience. But how do people obtain this experience if they need an industry-working background to get hired? Invitrogen offers its internship to avoid this potential catch, says Moses. The internship program can help postdocs learn to work under time pressures so that they are prepared for the real thing when they are hired for permanent positions, he says. To foster the integration of PhDs who lack experience in the industry, some biotech companies have initiated supplemental training. Invitrogen offers management training and other business-oriented courses to train young scientists in the business side of the biotech industry. Although the company has not performed a cost-benefit analysis, says Moses, these courses serve to reinforce an employee's learning map, which helps employees to understand how their job responsibilities fit into the entire business process at Invitrogen. Industry-sponsored academic programs can also teach business skills to doctoral students. Examples include a joint MBA/PhD program at San Diego State University, and a Master's in Bioscience (MBS) program at Keck Graduate Institute in Claremont, Calif. Other academic programs do exist aacross the US.2 San Diego State's MBA/PhD program produces job candidates who are proficient in both the scientific and business skills needed for biotech jobs, says Moses. Students in Keck's MBS program form teams to work on industry projects such as product development, says Dewey. The industry sponsor assigns a project, provides a research setting, and makes available a company liaison to serve as project advisor. The sooner the better
Perhaps the answer to biotech's hiring dilemma may be to expose potential scientists to the industry environment extremely early on. Genentech and Invitrogen are cosponsoring a biotech training program in American high schools, where the students have an opportunity to work on a science project on location at a biotech company. The Northwest Biotechnology/Biomedical Education and Careers Consortium also offers a similar program (http://elmo.shore.ctc.edu/NWBBECC/hsprog.html). The goal is to foster an early interest in the biological sciences by encouraging high-school students to eventually pursue a PhD degree and to expose up-and-coming scientists to the environment and business objectives of the biotech industry. From a business perspective, says Moses, the biotech sponsors expect to produce a long-term, steady supply of biotech-ready scientists through the continuous support of these programs.
1. T. Agres, "Best Places to Work 2006, Postdocs," The Scientist, 20(3):53-61, March 2006.
2. V. Gewin, "Increase job skills, increase value," The Scientist, 20(3):86-7, March 2006.
Advertisement
Rate this article
Bridging the Gulf by Rochelle Diamond [Comment posted 2006-08-02 19:13:56] Dear Mr Willaimson,
I read with great interest your article in the August 2006 issue of The Scientist and also the announcement of a diversity special supplement to be distributed with the November 2006 issue of the Scientits. As chairperson of the National Organization of Gay and Lesbian Scientists & Technical Professionals Inc.(NOGLSTP), I thought that you might be interested writing about a mentoring program that NOGLSTP launched this last January. The presence, visibility and contributions of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) scientists, engineers, and technical professionals has grown significantly over the last decade. Mentoring relationships to students and early-career professionals are vital in increasing the workforce of highly skilled, globally competitive LBGT professionals. Traditionally universities have provided students with mentor-protᅢᄅgᅢᄅ relationships that that may or may not provide assistance and guidance in the transition to the workplace. However, too often these relationships are elusive to LBGT students. Recently, the National Organization of Gay and Lesbian Scientists and Technical Professionals (NOGLSTP) joined MentorNetᅡᆴ (www.mentornet.net), an e-mentoring portal, in expanding mentoring services to science and technology- oriented LBGT students and early-career professionals. This alliance provides mentoring access to students who would otherwise have limited availability. Many companies now have LGBT employee resource groups (ERGs) that can link accomplished mentors with LGBT students and early career professionals to assist in the transition from the academic environment to the corporate/industrial world. NOGLSTP is working to connect these ERGs as well as professional societies and academics into our mentoring program. For example, NOGLSTP will be sponsoring a workshop at the Out and Equal Workplace Summit in Chicago mid- September (www.outandequal.org). This summit will have over 1800 attendees from many Fortune 500 companies. Out and Equal Workplace Advocates list LGBT ERGs from companies such as Pfizer, Merck, Medtronic, Dupont, BP, Wyeth, Bristol-Myers Squibb and more. We will also be presenting a forum at the Society for the Advancement of Chicano and Native American Scientists National Conference in Tampa late October (www.sacnas.org) and have preliminary acceptance for a symposium at the AAAS annual meeting in San Francisco next February. We feel that mentoring will assist to bridge the gulf that you describe in your article as well as to bridge the larger science and technology widening in this highly competitive global science economy. It is crucial that the United States educates, recruits, and retains highly skilled scientists, engineers, and technical professionals to keep its competitive edge. I have cc'd this email to the NOGLSTP mentoring coordinator, Dr. Amy Ross. If you would like more information about our program and NOGLSTP in general, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Rochelle A. Diamond Chairperson, NOGLSTP 626-395-4947 phone diamond@its.caltech.edu www.noglstp.org NOGLSTP is a non-profit educational organization under IRS section 501 (c)(3), an affiliate of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, a participating professional society in the MentorNetᅡᆴ Affiliated Partners Plus program, a sustaining member of the National Postdoctoral Association, and an endorsing society of National Engineers Week. Great article... Missing a few good programs by Mike Russell [Comment posted 2006-08-02 11:38:48] I have read several articles in The Scientist on this general theme, and have yet to read anything about the Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison Master of Science in Biotechnology. The UW MSB program has a very strong emphasis on real world business models and product development. For example one of the professors, Carl Gulbrandson, is from the Director of the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF). WARF which is a powerful engine for commercialization in the life sciences. Guest speakers have included human stem cell pioneer James Thomson, Chris Lapinski of Pfizer, Bill Linton, founder of Promega and many other leaders in the life science business. The MS in Biotech web site is LINK |
Register for FREE Online Access
Subscribe to the Magazine