The Shape of ArmageddonSure, the world will end. What will rise up to take the place of human civilization?
The years 2004 and 2005 brought global disasters enough to gladden the heart of any prophet of doom. With the tsunami, earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, famine, wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, suicide bombers, and bird flu, all the biblical signs are there to suggest that the end of the world is at hand. But that should be qualified by saying that the end of the world as we know it may be at hand - civilization, we call it. Human life will not be wiped off the face of the earth by natural disasters, plagues, or wars; there are just too many of us. Consider our history. The million Biafrans killed in that terrible 1967-1970 war of attempted secession in Nigeria were replaced by natural procreation in just one year. The Black Death of 1347-1351 wiped out at least one-third of the people of Europe when its population was a fraction of today's, but the continent recovered. There will always be some humans who avoid the killer diseases; in addition to isolated developing world tribes that have never been exposed to such killers, some people in developed countries are now showing resistance to AIDS. So what will the world look like after the populations of the major cities have been destroyed by nuclear holocaust or disease, and with them the whole infrastructure that moves money, food, and fuel over the face of the earth? People on the fringes of the global village will survive, but civilization will not - remember William Golding's Lord of the Flies? Members of mountain militias in the United States believe they have the answer, stockpiling food, fuel, and ammunition, but they will last only as long as those stocks last. They will soon use up their fuel by using their transport to sally forth and loot the area around their headquarters. Then they will turn to attacking each other for plunder until the ammunition runs out. The true survivors will be the woodsmen and plainsmen who know how to hunt with bows and arrows and traps, or grow field crops and live off the land. There will be no shortage of bush meat; in North America, there are more deer today, due to their protected status, than there were when the Mayflower landed. The Eskimos will move south to colonize abandoned land. The Australian aborigines will make a comeback. A few technologically savvy people may survive by absorption into primitive tribes, to whom they could impart advanced technology in much the same way as Mark Twain's Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court, so that in a few years the wheel, steam power, the printing press, electricity, and radio will have been reestablished and civilization will be on the way back to the mess it is in today. But whether humanity can reestablish itself, it is doomed in the end by the cooling sun. Bacteria are already way ahead of us in adapting to extreme environments, from polar below-zero temperatures and zero humidity to the edges of boiling hot geysers and much hotter undersea fumaroles. And now, thanks to groundbreaking work by Bonnie Bassler at Princeton and others (see her profile in the June 2006 issue), we know that they can communicate with each other. So if they can avoid internecine warfare and cooperate, then when all the existing coastal areas are under water and all that remains is desert, with no other animal or plant life, they could cover the land with biofilms, regulate the weather by changing surface reflectivity, control the atmosphere by determining how much land area is devoted to photosynthesis, recycle their pollutants, build nanobots to do their bidding, and as the sun cools, survive at freezing surface temperatures well below those that would end all homeothermic life. In the absence of any human competition, they may just take over, create a completely bacterial civilization, and rule the globe. Of course, once they become politicized, or worse, develop rival gods, this micro-utopia will be all ruin. Jack Woodall is director of the Nucleus for the Investigation of Emerging Infectious Diseases in the Institute of Medical Biochemistry at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Advertisement
Rate this article
He wishes he was bacteria by Rosie Ollah [Comment posted 2007-02-26 05:19:01] This guy, wishes he was a bacteria or a hunter. He needs a vacation. The Bird Flu by Just Moore [Comment posted 2007-02-26 00:46:30] The Bird Flu means the "End of Times", because it's the Superflu!
If you want more info on the bird flu and the End of Days, check out this bird flu discussion forum that everyone is talking about at LINK hope this helps! A Penny for your thoughts on by Kindly Wise [Comment posted 2006-08-26 02:26:43] Anonymous Fifteen-Year-Old Reader exemplifies the thoughts of most people on the topic of Human Extinction, i.e.: that humanity would have to be wiped out by Something Really Big. I suppose we assume that, because it took an earth-shattering asteroid impact to wipe out the dinosaurs an event of similar grandeur will be required to squish 6 billion humans.
Even though we are as a species eminently squishable, our lives are vulnerable to termination in more subtle ways. Anything that reduces agricultural output, for example, by even a few percent, will cause chaos as competing human societies vie for control over the resource. A rise of a few degrees in average temperature in the temeprate zones, with a resulting loss of water retention duringthe cool period, could a) reduce actual germination and growth of grain crops b) encourage the survival of agricultural pests c) encourage the survival of insect-borne diseases d) increase energy investment in controlling hazards to production of textile fibre, vegetable fats or food. Terrible wars may result in large loss of life, yes, but simple disruption by violence of services such as sewage treatment will cause death on a much longer time scale and will also reduce the birth rate by reducing the amount of energy available for the individual human to procreate successfully. Genus Homo was actually less likely to be wiped out when we were fewer on the ground, but capable of using a wider range of resources. We will find, to our chagrin, in about 500 years, a) that we have invested too much of our energy output in making and perfecting technology b) that we cannot eat technology c) that cockroaches and fungi CAN eat technology. d) that lots of other things can eat US. Anonymous 15 year old reader by Donald Duck [Comment posted 2006-08-25 18:49:13] Such a civilization destroying disaster would have to be big. There aren't enough nuclear missiles to harm smaller countries, plagues would need to kill off more than two thirds of the population, and war is limited to countries that hate eachother. The points on recovering from such a disaster are sound, but the claim that there is such a possible disaster is shaky. Even global warming wouldn't be enough as it would make Russia and Canada tropical. Homo sapiens will no longer exist in 300,000 years by James Magner [Comment posted 2006-08-24 20:37:45] I enjoyed this article, but I am uncertain that evoking changes in the sun in relation to the demise of Homo sapiens is really called for. Our species came into existence less than 300,000 years ago, and possibly less than 120,000 years ago, by evolving from a similar species. If a Homo erectus were somehow magically alive today, successful interbreeding with a Homo sapiens could not occur. Analogously, by a slow accumulation of mutations, by 300,000 years from now (and probably by 120,000 years from now) Homo sapiens will have genetically altered so much that it will have officially changed to another species (or two or three). Also, the sun will be shining only slightly warmer 120,000 or 500,000 years from now, but in a few billion years the diameter of the sun will gradually expand to somewhat less than the orbit of the earth, and as that is occurring all of the oceans will boil away. It is true that the sun will eventually cool, but all of life on earth a few billion years from now be boiled to death long before it faces solar cooling. The Shape of Armageddon by Segun [Comment posted 2006-08-02 18:25:33] Biblical accounts did not record anywhere that human life will be wiped off the face of the earth by natural disasters. This happened in Antediluvian period and God promised that He will never again destroy all living creatures (Genesis 6:20) by natural disasters. Noah and his family survived the first flood ever recorded in the history of the world. I believe that when the world ends, there will be survivors, some will survive to everlasting life and some to everlasting destruction. What will the world look like? A preview is recorded in the 21st Book of Revelation of the Holy Bible. Prophets (of doom or of joy) can only guess when the end will be because "No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man." (Matthew 24:36,37) |
Register for FREE Online Access
Subscribe to the Magazine