Even though the National Academy of Science listed it as a top priority in
1999, cytomegalovirus (CMV) vaccine development has languished in a pharmaceutical
backwater until recently. It was considered a money pit. "They've spent
massive amounts of money already," says Gerd Maul, a virologist at the
Wistar Institute in Philadelphia.
But the mood may be shifting because of a completely unrelated virus. "CMV
is going to be a target that all these companies are starting to look at, because
of the success of HPV," says Vijay Samant, president and CEO of Vical.
Samant is referring to Gardasil, the Merck vaccine for human papillomavirus
approved this year by the FDA.
A successful CMV vaccine could reach a similar market, but with less controversy.
"The real market is females of childbearing age who are CMV-negative,"
says Samant. Because CMV is not sexually transmitted, giving such a vaccine
to all girls at adolescence should not conflict with the religious or moral
objections that dogged the HPV vaccine.
Almost all current vaccines are aimed at children, but now vaccinologists are
broadening their focus. "A number of people are talking about a sort of
adolescent vaccination date or preadolescent vaccination date that would involve
papilloma, acellular pertussis, meningococcal vaccine, and conceivably CMV,"
says Stanley Plotkin, a vaccine development veteran from the Wistar Institute.
The price point is also rising. "The first vaccines, it was expected they
would be cheap, a requirement that was never applied to drugs," says Plotkin.
Drug prices climbed while vaccine prices remained low, but that's beginning
to change.
While Albert Sabin's oral poliovirus vaccine, introduced in the 1960s, sells
for $.08 per dose, Maurice Hilleman's recombinant hepatitis B vaccine, introduced
in the 1980s, costs $80 for a course of three injections. Samant, who headed
Merck's vaccine division before moving to Vical, estimates that the new HPV
vaccine will stabilize at about $300-$400 for a course of inoculations.
Those numbers are helping corporate researchers make a better business case.
"Vaccines are extremely profitable, because vaccines don't cost much to
make, and vaccines also don't have the traditional patent expiration that occurs
with pharma. They produce cash flow for a very long period of time," says
Samant.
The higher payout is essential for companies in the vaccine business; while
production costs of the final product can be low, development costs for modern
vaccines are not. For example, Plotkin estimates that the rotavirus vaccine
he worked on was in the pipeline for 25 years before its approval in 2006, at
a cost of about half a billion dollars.
For a CMV vaccine, a more insidious money problem could arise after it hits
the market. The burden of CMV-related birth defects rests mainly on public institutions,
while private insurers would bear much of the cost of vaccination. "If
you're running an HMO and you don't have anybody in your network who has CMV
disease ... you may be reluctant to incur the cost of immunizing everyone,"
says Jeff Chulay, chief medical officer at AlphaVax in Research Triangle Park,
NC.
Government agencies may pressure insurers to go along, though. The 1999 National
Academy of Science report estimated that delivering a CMV vaccine to adolescents
would cost about $340 million a year in direct expenses and amortized development
costs. The payoff, however, would be $1.5 billion in healthcare cost savings,
for a net gain of more than $1.1 billion to the national economy. Those figures
were based on a pessimistic scenario, in which the vaccine would be only 70%
efficacious, and only half the target population would accept it.