Misrepresenting intelligent design
Iowa State University, Ames, IA.

Email: Guillermo Gonzalez - gonzog@iastate.edu
The Scientist 2005, 19(16):8

Published 29 August 2005



In an article[1] about the recent Smithsonian screening of "The Privileged Planet," based on a book I co-authored, Randall Kremer, the museum's director of public affairs commented, "The scientific content for the most part is accurate. The problem we have is that the science is used to draw a philosophical conclusion."

Perhaps a more accurate statement would have been, "The problem we have is that the science is used to draw a politically incorrect conclusion." The museum clearly does not have a problem with all philosophical statements in science films, because the museum sponsored Carl Sagan's "Cosmos" documentary in which he tells viewers, "The Cosmos is all that is, or ever was, or ever will be." That's not only a philosophical assertion, it's one science could never confirm.




References

1.  Stokes T: "...and Smithsonian has ID troubles,".
The Scientist 19(13):13.
  July 4, 2005
Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
 


Advertisement


 

Rate this article

Rating: 1.00/5 (1 vote )








Front Cover

Register for FREE Online Access

  • »Current issue
  • »Best Places to Work and Salary surveys
  • »Daily news and monthly contents emails

Register »

Subscribe to the Magazine

  • »Monthly print issues
  • »Unlimited online access
  • »Special offers on books, apparel, and more

Subscribe »

Library Subscriptions
Recommend to a Librarian

Masthead | Contact | Advertise | Privacy Policy
© 1986-2012 The Scientist